Table 3.
Exposure: NO2 | ||
Remotea Exposure | Recentb Exposure | |
Estd (95% CI) | Estd (95% CI) | |
Estimates of Direct Effectc | ||
Effect of NO2 on annual change in episodic memory (γNO2 on Δem) | .179 (−.119; .477) | −.024 (−.425; .377) |
Estimates of Indirect Effectc | ||
Effects of NO2 on annual changes in GDS-15 (γNO2 on Δdep) | .255 (.074; .436) | .203 (−.042; .447) |
Effects of GDS-15 performance on annual change in episodic memory (γLdep on Δem) | −.372 (−.594; −.150) | −.384 (−.615; −.154) |
Indirect effect of NO2 on annual change in episodic memory (γNO2 on Δdep * γLdep on Δem) | −.095 (−.171; −.026) e | −.078 (−.184; .018)e |
Exposure: PM2.5 | ||
Remotea Exposure | Recentb Exposure | |
Estd (95% CI) | Estd (95% CI) | |
Estimates of Direct Effectc | ||
Effect of PM2.5 on annual change in episodic memory (γPM2.5 on Δem) | .114 (−.149; .377) | .154 (−.183; .491) |
Estimates of Indirect Effectc | ||
Effects of PM2.5 on annual changes in GDS-15 (γPM2.5 on Δdep) | .138 (−.004; .280) | .123 (−.081; .328) |
Effects of GDS-15 performance on annual change in episodic memory (γLdep on Δem) | −.377 (−.608; −.146) | −.380 (−.612; −.148) |
Indirect effect of PM2.5 on annual change in episodic memory (γPM2.5 on Δdep * γLdep on Δem) | −.052 (−.112; −.001) e | −.047 (−.130; .035)e |
Abbreviations: NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; PM2.5 = particulate matter with <2.5 μm; episodic memory = latent factor consisting of the immediate and delayed recall from the East Boston Memory Test and the world list memory from the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status; depressive symptoms = 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, CI = Confidence interval, Est = parameter estimate
Estimates bolded if statistically significant at p<0.05
Remote represents the 3-year average exposures to regional PM2.5 and NO2 10 years prior to study baseline
Recent represents the 3-year average exposures to regional PM2.5 and NO2 for the 3 years prior to study baseline
All effects below were derived from the bivariate structural equation models (SEM) as depicted in figure 2 panel A, with exposure scaled by interquartile range from the remote period ( PM2.5 scaled by 3.35 μg/m3 and NO2 scaled by 9.55 ppb).
In all models, the effects were adjusted for initial age at WHIMS-ECHO, race/ethnicity, geographic region of residence, employment status, education, household income, lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol use, physical activities), clinical characteristics (use of hormone treatment; hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, and history of cardiovascular disease), and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics.
95% confidence interval for the indirect effect is asymmetric and estimated via Monte Carlo Simulation