Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov 17;69(2):474–484. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16889

Table 3.

Bivariate latent change score structural equation models examining the direct effect of recent and remote exposure to NO2 and PM2.5 on changes in episodic memory as well as the respective indirect effect mediated by depressive symptoms (N = 1,583).

Exposure: NO2
Remotea Exposure Recentb Exposure
Estd (95% CI) Estd (95% CI)
Estimates of Direct Effectc
 Effect of NO2 on annual change in episodic memory (γNO2 on Δem) .179 (−.119; .477) −.024 (−.425; .377)
Estimates of Indirect Effectc
 Effects of NO2 on annual changes in GDS-15 (γNO2 on Δdep) .255 (.074; .436) .203 (−.042; .447)
 Effects of GDS-15 performance on annual change in episodic memory (γLdep on Δem) −.372 (−.594; −.150) −.384 (−.615; −.154)
 Indirect effect of NO2 on annual change in episodic memory (γNO2 on Δdep * γLdep on Δem) −.095 (−.171; −.026) e −.078 (−.184; .018)e
Exposure: PM2.5
Remotea Exposure Recentb Exposure
Estd (95% CI) Estd (95% CI)
Estimates of Direct Effectc
 Effect of PM2.5 on annual change in episodic memory (γPM2.5 on Δem) .114 (−.149; .377) .154 (−.183; .491)
Estimates of Indirect Effectc
 Effects of PM2.5 on annual changes in GDS-15 (γPM2.5 on Δdep) .138 (−.004; .280) .123 (−.081; .328)
 Effects of GDS-15 performance on annual change in episodic memory (γLdep on Δem) −.377 (−.608; −.146) −.380 (−.612; −.148)
 Indirect effect of PM2.5 on annual change in episodic memory (γPM2.5 on Δdep * γLdep on Δem) −.052 (−.112; −.001) e −.047 (−.130; .035)e

Abbreviations: NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; PM2.5 = particulate matter with <2.5 μm; episodic memory = latent factor consisting of the immediate and delayed recall from the East Boston Memory Test and the world list memory from the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status; depressive symptoms = 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, CI = Confidence interval, Est = parameter estimate

Estimates bolded if statistically significant at p<0.05

a

Remote represents the 3-year average exposures to regional PM2.5 and NO2 10 years prior to study baseline

b

Recent represents the 3-year average exposures to regional PM2.5 and NO2 for the 3 years prior to study baseline

c

All effects below were derived from the bivariate structural equation models (SEM) as depicted in figure 2 panel A, with exposure scaled by interquartile range from the remote period ( PM2.5 scaled by 3.35 μg/m3 and NO2 scaled by 9.55 ppb).

d

In all models, the effects were adjusted for initial age at WHIMS-ECHO, race/ethnicity, geographic region of residence, employment status, education, household income, lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol use, physical activities), clinical characteristics (use of hormone treatment; hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, and history of cardiovascular disease), and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics.

e

95% confidence interval for the indirect effect is asymmetric and estimated via Monte Carlo Simulation