Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 29;12(41):13730–13736. doi: 10.1039/d1sc04961e

Optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d1sc04961e-u1.jpg
Entry Rh(ii)* Solvent Yieldb [%] erc
1 Rh2(R-DOSP)4 DCE 56 29 : 71
2 Rh2(5S-MEPY)4 DCE 17 50 : 50
3 Rh2(S-BTPCP)4 DCE 61 8 : 92
4 Rh2(S-PTPA)4 DCE 91 91 : 9
5 Rh2(S-PTTL)4 DCE 86 97 : 3
6 Rh2(S-PTAD)4 DCE 93 94 : 6
7 Rh2(S-NTTL)4 DCE 92 96 : 4
8 Rh2(S-TCPTTL)4 DCE 95 98 : 2
9 Rh 2 (S-TFPTTL) 4 DCE 98 d 98:2
10 Rh2(S-TFPTTL)4 DCM 88 98 : 2
11 Rh2(S-TFPTTL)4 Toluene 92 98 : 2
12 Rh2(S-TFPTTL)4 MeCN 16 92 : 8
13 Rh2(S-TFPTTL)4 n-Hexane 96 98 : 2
14e Rh2(S-TFPTTL)4 DCE 65f 96 : 4
graphic file with name d1sc04961e-u2.jpg
a

Unless otherwise noted, reactions were performed at 0.1 M in DCE using 0.20 mmol substrate and catalyst (2 mol%) under a N2 atmosphere.

b

Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

c

The er value of 2a was determined by HPLC using a chiral stationary phase.

d

Isolated yields.

e

1 mol% catalyst was used.

f

25% starting material was recovered.