Table 1.

Fit indices for confirmatory factor analysis models

	χ2	df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	Δχ2	Δdf
1. Hypothesized eight-factor solution	1373.00*	663	.92	.91	.05	–	–
2. Seven-factor solution, combining T1 AOC and T3 AOC	1653.69*	670	.88	.87	.06	280.69*	7
3. Seven-factor solution, combining T1 LMX-C and T2 LMX-C	1498.81*	670	.90	.89	.05	125.81*	7
4. Seven-factor solution, combining T1 laissez-faire leadership and T2 LMX-C	1581.26*	670	.89	.88	.06	208.25*	7
5. Seven-factor solution, combining T1 RSC and CSC	1611.18*	670	.89	.88	.06	238.18*	7
6. Seven-factor solution, combining T1 RSC and ISC	2162.32*	670	.82	.81	.07	789.32*	7
7. Seven-factor solution, combining T2 LMX-C and T3 AOC	1549.96*	670	.90	.89	.05	176.96*	7
8. Six-factor solution, combining T1 LMX-C with T2 LMX-C, and T1 AOC with T3 AOC	1774.96*	676	.87	.86	.06	401.96*	13
9. Six-factor solution, combining all self-concept variables	2402.76*	676	.80	.78	.08	1029.75*	13
10. One-factor solution, combining all variables	6102.10*	694	.36	.32	.13	4729.10*	31

N = 449, based on full information maximum likelihood estimation. df, degrees of freedom; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; T1, time 1; T2, time 2; T3, time 3; AOC, affective organizational commitment; LMX-C, leader-member exchange, contribution dimension; RSC, relational self-concept; CSC, collective self-concept; ISC, individual self-concept

*p < .01