Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 26;36(4):533–551. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09700-9

Table 4.

Path analysis results for the moderation and moderated mediation models

Moderation Moderated mediation
Baseline model Moderated model Baseline model Moderated mediation model
Variable B SE B SE B SE B SE 95% CI
T1 Laissez-faire → T2 LMX-C − .06 .09 − .04 .08 − .07 .09 − .05 .08 [− .209, .110]
T1 RSC → T2 LMX-C .27 .22 .33 .24 .27 .23 .36 .25 [− .151, .885]
T1 CSC → T2 LMX-C − .29 .16 − .31 .16 − .28 .16 − .31 .17 [− .646, .098]
T1 ISC → T2 LMX-C − .01 .12 − .02 .12 − .00 .12 − .01 .11 [− .243, .219]
T1 LMX-C → T2 LMX-C .73*** .09 .74*** .09 .73*** .09 .74*** .09 [.571, .959]
T1 Laissez-faire × T1 RSC → T2 LMX-C − .67* .28 − .69* .28 [− 1.317, − .174]
T1 Laissez-faire → T3 AOC − .09 .07 − .09 .07 [− .233, .041]
T1 RSC → T3 AOC .51* .24 .57* .25 [.046, 1.122]
T1 CSC → T3 AOC − .22 .13 − .24 .14 [− .509, .106]
T1 ISC → T3 AOC − .12 .09 − .12 .09 [− .316, .061]
T1 AOC → T3 AOC .72*** .06 .72*** .06 [.595, .859]
T2 LMX-C → T3 AOC .15** .05 .14** .05 [.023, .249]
First stage moderation:
  High RSC (+ 1 SD) − .34* .15 − .36* .15 [− .672, − .067]
  Mean (0) − .04 .08 − .05 .08 [− .209, .110]
  Low RSC (− 1 SD) .26 .14 .26 .15 [− .015, .595]
  Difference (± 1 SD) − .60* .25 − .62* .25 [− 1.185, − .156]
Indirect effect
  High RSC (+ 1 SD) − .05* .03 [− .111, − .002]
  Mean (0) − .01 .01 [− .033, .017]
  Low RSC (− 1 SD) .04 .02 [− .004, .098]
  Difference (± 1 SD) − .09* .05 [− .197, − .007]

N = 449, based on full information maximum likelihood estimation. B, unstandardized beta coefficient; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; T1, time 1; T2, time 2; T3, time 3; LMX-C, leader-member exchange, contribution dimension; RSC, relational self-concept; CSC, collective self-concept; ISC, individual self-concept; AOC, affective organizational commitment

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001