Table 2.
Comparison with WOA Mirjalili and Lewis (2016)
| Function | Proposed approach | WOA Mirjalili and Lewis (2016) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.775955 ± 0.222759 | 1.41E−30 ± 4.91E−30 | 0 | |
| 5.154556 ± 2.273995 | 0.072581 ± 0.39747 | 0 | |
| 0.759658 ± 0.251091 | 1.06E−21 ± 2.39E−21 | 0 | |
| 26.778816 ± 3.804910 | 27.86558 ± 0.763626 | 0 | |
| 0.809812 ± 0.088605 | 0.000289 ± 0.001586 | 0 | |
| 2.230591 ± 0.810609 | 7.4043 ± 9.897572 | 0 | |
| − 12554.89 ± 33.2842 | − 5080.76 ± 695.7968 | − 12569.48 | |
| − 1.031611 ± 3.73E-05 | − 1.03163 ± 4.2E−07 | − 1.0316 | |
| 0.998004 ± 5.98E-10 | 2.111973 ± 2.498594 | 0.998004 1 |
This version of Schwefel min − 418.982930 (see Mirjalili and Lewis 2016)