Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;38(2):211–230. doi: 10.1007/s10437-021-09428-8

Table 1.

Observations of impressions identified from AZ22, MT25, and MK36 sherds, including observation from surface impressions (SEM) and microCT (CT). For images from CTscans see OSM Images

Site name Sherd no. Method Involucre w/ torn peduncle Involucre w/ smooth base Involucre base w/bristles (indet) Bristle(s) Paired spikelets Spikelet Lemma/palea frag. Spikelet: Echinochloa (wild) in husk Spikelet: cf. Panicum sp. Spikelet Sorghum sp. (wild) Other poaceae Notes
AZ22 1 SEM 1
AZ22 3 SEM Culm node
AZ22 11 SEM 1 1 4
AZ22 27 SEM 2 1 15 1
AZ22 27 ct 30 100s 15 All with smooth involucre with single spikelet
AZ22 117 SEM 10
AZ22 123 SEM 5
AZ22 184 SEM 1
AZ22 187 SEM 1
AZ22 192 SEM 1 indeterminate grain
AZ22 12/13 SEM 1 2 7 2 Possible wild type involucre(?), with solitary spikelet
MT25 140 SEM 2 1
MT25 175 SEM 2 1 Sorghum spikelet 2.4 mm wide
MK36 276 ct 2 1 1 3 2 Ripped involucre w/ paired spikelet in same impression; smooth abscission scar involucre w/ paired spikelet in same impression
MK36 295 ct 2
MK36 304 ct 1
MK36 369 ct 1
MK36 439 ct 1
MK36 460 ct No inclusions
MK36 543 ct 1 1
MK36 587 ct No inclusions
MK36 728 ct 1
MK36 1237 ct 2 1 1 3 Solitary spikelet in involucre with torn peduncle
AZ22 totals 0 33 3 27 0 32 2 0 1
MT25 totals 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0
MK36 totals 4 2 2 4 3 7 1 1 0