Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 12;24(2):593–616. doi: 10.1007/s10683-020-09674-8

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Maximum likelihood estimates of crra coefficients φ. b Average perceived riskiness (subject-demeaned data) for the four risk preference elicitation methods. c Maximum likelihood estimates of the standard deviation of the structural noise parameter σ. d Average perceived complexity (subject-demeaned data) for the four risk preference elicitation methods. In all panels, error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The dashed lines indicate the overall estimate (pooling all tasks) in Panels a and c (φ^=0.585 and σ^=0.324), and depict means in Panels b and d; shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Standard errors in the maximum likelihood estimations are clustered on the individual level; n=198. bret, cem, mpl, and scl denote the “bomb” risk elicitation task, the certainty equivalent method, the multiple price list, and the single choice list, respectively