Table 2.
Estimated tags, tag quality, and species diversity of the samples.
| Sample ID | Clean tags | Valid tags | Valid percent | OUT counts | Total OTUs | Observed species | Chao1 | Good's coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M.01 | 71022 | 62912 | 88.58% | 1432 | 5181 | 1402.3 | 2363.8 | 0.989402 |
| M.02 | 74730 | 66072 | 88.41% | 1350 | 5181 | 1292.7 | 2087.1 | 0.990492 |
| M.03 | 71745 | 66208 | 92.28% | 1752 | 5181 | 1687.9 | 2435.0 | 0.989183 |
| M.04 | 72892 | 61201 | 83.96% | 1286 | 5181 | 1276 | 2142.8 | 0.990585 |
| M.05 | 72755 | 68461 | 94.10% | 1473 | 5181 | 1405.5 | 2110.3 | 0.991535 |
| M.06 | 73836 | 63441 | 85.92% | 1469 | 5181 | 1435 | 2197.9 | 0.990143 |
| M.07 | 70749 | 63789 | 90.16% | 1452 | 5181 | 1416.3 | 2212.6 | 0.989977 |
| M.08 | 72424 | 65118 | 89.91% | 1380 | 5181 | 1330.8 | 2317.6 | 0.989657 |
| M.09 | 71942 | 65394 | 90.90% | 1510 | 5181 | 1457.7 | 2395.8 | 0.98916 |
| M.10 | 70637 | 62832 | 88.95% | 1544 | 5181 | 1512.3 | 2364.3 | 0.989155 |
| M.11 | 70569 | 63563 | 90.07% | 1462 | 5181 | 1425.6 | 2083.2 | 0.990467 |
| SM ± SEM | 72118 ± 1304 | 64454 ± 1929 | 89.39 ± 2.65% | 1465 ± 115 | 5181 ± 0 | 1422.0 ± 107.6 | 2246.4 ± 126.3 | 0.9900 ± 0.0007 |
| F.01 | 71274 | 66186 | 92.86% | 1235 | 5181 | 1188.4 | 1831.3 | 0.99166 |
| F.02 | 74255 | 68779 | 92.63% | 1328 | 5181 | 1250.9 | 2082.6 | 0.990988 |
| F.03 | 73743 | 68612 | 93.04% | 1325 | 5181 | 1245.7 | 1934.6 | 0.99093 |
| F.04 | 70808 | 64919 | 91.68% | 1249 | 5181 | 1207.8 | 1909.5 | 0.991316 |
| F.05 | 72305 | 67972 | 94.01% | 1240 | 5181 | 1179.6 | 1817.0 | 0.991786 |
| F.06 | 64237 | 60115 | 93.58% | 1171 | 5181 | 1170.6 | 1672.0 | 0.99285 |
| SM ± SEM | 71104 ± 3307 | 66097 ± 3006 | 92.97 ± 0.74% | 1258 ± 55 | 5181 ± 0 | 1207.2 ± 31.2 | 1874.5 ± 125.4 | 0.9916 ± 0.0006 |
SEM: standard error of the sample mean; SM: sample mean.