TABLE 3.
Regression analyses for IPTS factors, gender, and their interactions predicting suicidal ideation at follow-up
Suicidal ideation at follow-up | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||
PB | TB | PB & TB | PB | TB | PB | TB | |
Baseline suicidal ideation | .46 (.05)*** | .50 (.04)*** | .46 (.05)*** | .47 (.05)*** | .50 (.05)*** | .47 (.05)*** | .47 (.05)*** |
Perceived burdensomeness | .20 (.05)*** | - | .16 (.06)** | −0.09 (.11) | - | −.11 (.11) | .14 (.06)* |
Thwarted belongingness | - | .15 (.04)*** | .07 (.05) | - | −.10 (.09) | .06 (.05) | −.14 (.09) |
Cisgender young man (reference) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cisgender young woman | - | - | - | .12 (.12) | .07 (.11) | .12 (.12) | .06 (.12) |
Transgender/genderqueer | - | - | - | .22 (.11)* | .21 (.11)* | .22 (.11)* | .16 (.11) |
Cisgender young woman × PB | - | - | - | .34 (.13)** | .32 (.13)* | ||
Transgender/genderqueer × PB | - | - | - | .33 (.12)** | .33 (.13)* | ||
Cisgender young woman × TB | - | - | - | .23 (.11)* | .21 (.11) | ||
Transgender/genderqueer × TB | - | - | - | .34 (.10)** | .32 (.11)** |
Note: Standardized regression coefficients are shown with SE in parentheses. In Model 1, PB and TB were tested as separate predictors of SI at follow-up, controlling for SI at baseline; in Model 2, PB and TB were tested as simultaneous predictors of SI at follow-up, controlling for SI at baseline; in Model 3, gender was tested as a moderator of the associations between PB/TB (in separate models) and SI at follow-up, controlling for SI at baseline; in Model 4, gender was tested as a moderator of the associations between PB/TB and SI at follow-up, controlling for SI at baseline and the other IPTS factor; gender was dummy-coded and the IPTS factors were mean-centered to compute the interaction terms.
Abbreviations: PB, perceived burdensomeness; SI, suicidal ideation; TB, thwarted belongingness.