Table 2.
Results of ordered logistic regression for loneliness
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | β (SE) | 95% CI | β (SE) | 95% .I |
|
Living arrangement (Ref. No partner) | ||||
| Coresidential partnership | −1.39*** (0.17) | −1.73 −1.05 | −1.25*** (0.17) | −1.58 −0.91 |
| LAT partnership | 0.14 (0.30) | −0.45 0.74 | 0.20 (0.30) | −0.40 0.80 |
| Social network | ||||
| Size | – | – | −0.24** (0.07) | −0.37 −0.10 |
| Children and grandchildren | −0.24 (0.16) | −0.56 0.08 | 0.14 (0.20) | −0.26 0.53 |
| Siblings | −0.26 (0.25) | −0.74 0.23 | −0.08 (0.26) | −0.59 0.43 |
| Other family members | −0.13 (0.15) | −0.42 0.16 | 0.08 (0.15) | −0.21 0.38 |
| Friends | −0.19 (0.22) | −0.62 0.24 | −0.02 (0.22) | −0.46 0.42 |
| Acquaintances | −0.33 (0.20) | −0.73 0.07 | −0.14 (0.21) | −0.56 0.27 |
| F | 19.32*** | – | 19.34*** | – |
| N | 1860 | – | 1860 | – |
SE Standard error, CI Confidence interval, LAT Living apart together, β Unstandardized coefficient
Note: NRW80+; weighted data; Both models control for depression, age, gender and education
** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001