Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 27;11:21211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00617-8

Table 6.

Attitude of animal farm owners/workers towards antimicrobial resistances and use in Amhara regional state, North Western Ethiopia (N = 91).

Attitude related items Agree
N (%)
Neutral
N (%)
Disagree
N (%)
Antibiotic resistance in animals is not important for public health 59 (64.8) 14 (15.4) 18 (19.8)
There is relationship between antibiotic use in animals and development of resistance 33 (36.3) 19 (20.8) 39 (42.9)
The use of antibiotics in livestock causes the emergence of resistant bacteria which cause diseases in humans 35 (38.4) 16 (17.6) 40 (44)
Restriction of antibiotic use in animals will lead more benefit than damage 37 (40.7) 9 (9.9) 45 (49.4)
Use of antibiotic in animals does affect myself or my family indirectly 47 (51.6) 10 (11) 34 (37.4)
AMD residues and drug resistance will occur when AM are not used prudently 47 (51.6) 16 (17.6) 28 (30.8)
Antimicrobial usage for protection against diseases on farms is the most important 66 (72.5) 8 (8.8) 17 (18.7)
Usage of the same AMD for long period of time can lead to AMR 56 (61.5) 9 (9.9) 26 (28.6)
Usage of AMD for non-therapeutic reasons lead to AMR 49 (53.8) 18 (19.8) 24 (26.4)
Purchasing of AMD from a drug company or cooperative with a legal permit is safe 64 (70.3) 9 (9.9) 18 (19.8)
The most important reason for choosing AMD on my farm is its effectiveness 23 (25.3) 9 (9.9) 59 (64.8)
Sale and distribution of AMD shall only be done by persons permitted to do so by law 49 (53.8) 20 (22) 22 (24.2)
Drug withdrawal periods should be adhered to as per the prescription to avoid drug residues in meat or animal products 51 (56) 15 (16.5) 25 (27.5)
Overall level of attitude Frequency (%)
Positive 48 (52.8)
Negative 43 (47.2)