Table 5.
Target and obtained factor matrices with corresponding CPM angles, explained variances, and congruence coefficients for comparing target and obtained factor loadings of CPM metatraits, ICD-11 and DSM-5 psychopathological trait-domains in three analyses conducted in Study 2 (N = 355).
| Target matrix | Analysis A | Analysis B | Analysis C | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICD-11 model | DSM-5 model | Common six-domains model | |||||||||||||||||
| Θ | F1 | F2 | F1 | F2 | R2 | Congr. | Θ | F1 | F2 | R2 | Congr. | Θ | F1 | F2 | R2 | Congr. | Θ | ||
| CPM | Delta-Plus | 135 | 0.71 | −0.71 | 0.69 | −0.53 | 0.76 | 0.99 | 126.8 | 0.67 | −0.46 | 0.66 | 0.98 | 125.0 | 0.65 | −0.46 | 0.64 | 0.98 | 120.5 |
| Alpha-Plus | 90 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.15 | 0.67 | 0.98 | 79.2 | 0.75 | 0.18 | 0.59 | 0.97 | 77.2 | 0.76 | 0.18 | 0.61 | 0.97 | 71.9 | |
| Gamma-Plus | 45 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 49.5 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 47.7 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 43.9 | |
| Beta-Plus | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.97 | 14.3 | 0.13 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.99 | 9.7 | 0.15 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.98 | 5.8 | |
| Delta-Minus | 315 | −0.71 | 0.71 | −0.57 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 315.8 | −0.59 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 314.8 | −0.56 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 310.0 | |
| Alpha-Minus | 270 | −1.00 | 0.00 | −0.80 | −0.02 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 267.7 | −0.73 | −0.07 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 265.2 | −0.75 | −0.07 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 260.5 | |
| Gamma-Minus | 225 | −0.71 | −0.71 | −0.64 | −0.58 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 227.3 | −0.60 | −0.61 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 224.7 | −0.60 | −0.59 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 221.2 | |
| Beta-Minus | 180 | 0.00 | −1.00 | 0.08 | −0.80 | 0.65 | 0.99 | 173.6 | 0.16 | −0.82 | 0.70 | 0.98 | 169.2 | 0.15 | −0.85 | 0.75 | 0.98 | 165.4 | |
| ICD-11/DSM-5 | Negative Affectivity | 225 | −0.71 | −0.71 | −0.55 | −0.27 | 0.37 | 0.95 | 243.4 | −0.67 | −0.27 | 0.53 | 0.92 | 248.3 | −0.48 | −0.08 | 0.24 | 0.81 | 256.6 |
| Detachment | 180 | 0.00 | −1.00 | −0.17 | −0.56 | 0.34 | 0.96 | 196.1 | −0.52 | −0.57 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 222.7 | −0.33 | −0.46 | 0.32 | 0.82 | 211.0 | |
| Dissociality/Antagonism | 270 | −1.00 | 0.00 | −0.50 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.99 | 278.3 | −0.66 | 0.06 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 275.8 | −0.54 | 0.08 | 0.30 | 0.99 | 274.4 | |
| Disinhibition | 315 | −0.71 | 0.71 | −0.70 | 0.13 | 0.50 | 0.83 | 280.3 | −0.61 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.93 | 293.2 | −0.65 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.76 | 269.9 | |
| Anankastia | 135 | 0.71 | −0.71 | 0.36 | −0.32 | 0.23 | 1.00 | 131.3 | −0.20 | −0.07 | 0.04 | −0.42 | 245.5 | ||||||
| Psychoticism | 292.5 | −0.92 | 0.38 | −0.60 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.94 | 272.4 | −0.50 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.98 | 275.6 | ||||||
| Factor/Overall congruence | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.85 | ||||||||||
The target matrix is based on the hypothesized circumplex structure shown in Figure 2. Θ, angles in degrees; F1 and F2, factors; Congr., Congruence coefficients.