Table 1.
The sequencing data processing results of fecal samples.
| Sample ID | Raw reads | Clean reads | Effective reads | AvgLen (bp) | Effective (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 79,788 | 79,127 | 78,976 | 244 | 98.98 |
| C2 | 79,939 | 79,265 | 79,117 | 242 | 98.97 |
| C3 | 80,016 | 79,246 | 78,989 | 243 | 98.72 |
| C4 | 79,958 | 79,208 | 78,823 | 246 | 98.58 |
| C5 | 80,125 | 79,447 | 79,303 | 245 | 98.97 |
| C6 | 80,098 | 79,491 | 79,424 | 242 | 99.16 |
| C7 | 80,031 | 79,338 | 78,992 | 243 | 98.70 |
| C8 | 79,783 | 79,091 | 78,891 | 237 | 98.88 |
| D1 | 80,208 | 79,586 | 79,443 | 246 | 99.05 |
| D2 | 80,232 | 79,595 | 79,156 | 244 | 98.66 |
| D3 | 79,871 | 79,343 | 79,241 | 226 | 99.21 |
| D4 | 80,272 | 79,584 | 79,352 | 238 | 98.85 |
| D5 | 80,063 | 79,368 | 79,093 | 241 | 98.79 |
| D6 | 79,996 | 79,309 | 79,020 | 240 | 98.78 |
| D7 | 80,043 | 79,352 | 79,331 | 241 | 99.11 |
| D8 | 80,296 | 79,706 | 79,620 | 239 | 99.16 |