Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 14;9:753715. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.753715

TABLE 4.

State-of-art review on the optimization of the microstructure of bone scaffolds.

Type of microstructure Objective function Design variables References
Scaffold with the dimension explicitly expressed Maximize the scaffold stiffness or permeability Stiffness Xiao et al. (2018)
Permeability Dias et al. (2014)
Maximize the newly formed bones Computational mechanobiological model Boccaccio et al. (2018)
Geometrical parameters Montazerian et al. (2019)
Minimize the difference between the designed scaffold and the human bone Biomechanical stability, Young’s modulus Wieding et al. (2014)
Scaffold with the dimension implicitly expressed Maximize the scaffold stiffness or permeability, or the minimum of the flexibility Stiffness Hollister and Lin (2007)
Volume fraction Xiao et al. (2012)
Minimize the difference in the morphology, mechanical properties between the scaffold and the human bone Geometrical parameters Shi et al. (2018)
Porosity, Young’s modulus and pore size Vijayavenkataraman et al. (2018)
Non-periodic, irregular bionic microstructure Minimize the difference in the morphology, mechanical properties between the scaffold and the human bone Histomorphometry indices of trabecular bone Gomez et al. (2016)
Porosity Wang et al. (2018b)