| Genomic HRD assay |
|
BRCA mutation + GIS score (or LOH score) |
|
Unable to detect non-BRCA HRR gene mutations
Indeterminate cutoff threshold defining HRD status
Intratumor heterogeneity between specimen biopsy site and other tumor-invasive or metastatic sites
Unable to represent the functional HR
|
| Targeted gene panel |
|
Report limited to the customized genes of the panel
Unable to detect noncoding and structural variants
Heterogeneous coverage based on library preparation and enrichment method
Unable to represent the functional HR
|
| Whole exome sequencing |
|
Unable to detect noncoding and structural variants
Heterogeneous coverage based on library preparation and enrichment method
Unable to represent the functional HR
|
| Whole genome sequencing |
Analysis of all coding and noncoding regions in the genome
Detect CNV, variants, and structural rearrangements with high sensitivity
Mutational signatures: “Signature 3” is associated with BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer
|
Expensive and time consuming
Difficult interpretation of results (much VUS)
Unable to represent the functional HR
|
| Promoter methylation |
|
Unable to detect HRR gene mutations
Conflicting results for HRR gene methylation in predicting PARPi response
Unresolved technical problems, including sample purity, quantitative protocols, and definition of gene copy number changes
Unable to represent the functional HR
|
| Functional HRD assay |
| RAD51 foci formation assay |
|
Unable to detect HRR gene mutations
Unresolved technical problems, including timing, tissue sampling, DNA damage induction, methods of measurement, and definition of HRD
Unsuitable for slowly proliferating tumors
Unable to identify defects in RAD51 downstream or RAD51-independent mechanisms
|
| DNA fiber assay |
|
Unable to detect HRR gene mutations
Requires fresh, viable tissues
Indeterminate definition of replication fork degradation
Indeterminate correlation with clinical response
|