Skip to main content
. 1999 Oct;37(10):3187–3193. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.10.3187-3193.1999

TABLE 2.

Reactivities of MAbs used to distinguish G types 1 to 4 and 9 by serotyping EIA with a panel of cell culture-adapted rotaviruses

Rotavirus strain G serotype Reciprocal titer of MAb F45:1 in serotyping EIA formata OD450 with given MAb (MAb G serotype specificity)b:
F45:1 (9) RV-4:2 (1) RV-5:3 (2) RV-3:1 (3) ST-3:1 (4) 60 (VP7)
116E 9 >1 × 107 1.283 0.184 0.136 0.173 0.116 1.450
F45 9 >1 × 107 2.768 0.200 0.153 0.199 0.243 2.657
WI61 9 >1 × 107 0.970 0.179 0.127 0.172 0.215 1.462
AU32 9 >1 × 107 0.463 0.187 0.124 0.168 0.210 0.747
Hoso 4 2 × 106 2.586 0.040 0.039 0.040 2.495 2.868
ST-3 4 2 × 104 0.130 0.038 0.036 0.043 1.654 2.839
RV-4 1 5 × 103 0.127 2.491 0.037 0.039 0.039 2.791
RV-5 2 7 × 103 0.133 0.040 0.362 0.035 0.036 0.955
SA11 3 5 × 103 0.110 0.041 0.038 2.680 0.045 2.977
TFR41 5 5 × 103 0.104 0.038 0.037 0.041 0.220 0.879
a

All rotavirus strains tested reacted with MAb F45:1. However, the dilution of MAb F45:1 used to screen samples in the serotyping EIA was higher than its titers with RV-4, RV-5, SA11, and TFR41, so these rotaviruses were not detected in the serotyping EIA with the single optimal dilution of MAb F45:1. 

b

Positive reactions in the serotyping EIA, in which MAbs were used at a single optimal dilution, are shown in boldface.