TABLE 2.
Correct identification rates for the different Enterobacter cloacae complex species and corresponding confidence scores obtained with the two identification systems used in this study
| Species | MALDI biotyper software with Bruker databasea |
MSI software with online databasea |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % correct identification (n/N) | % precision (n/Ni) | % correct identification (n/N) | % precision (n/Ni) | |
| E. asburiae | 44 (8/18) | 50 (8/16) | 94 (17/18) | 74 (17/23) |
| E. bugandensis | 100 (9/9) | 31 (9/29) | 78 (7/9) | 64 (7/11) |
| E. cloacae | 50 (3/6) | 2 (3/176) | 83 (5/6) | 100 (5/5) |
| E. kobei | 25 (2/8) | 25 (2/8) | 100 (8/8) | 50 (8/16) |
| E. ludwigii | 56 (10/18) | 77 (10/13) | 72 (13/18) | 81 (13/16) |
| E. roggenkampii | 0 (0/24) | NA (0/0) | 66 (16/24) | 94 (16/17) |
| E. hormaechei | 20 (39/198) | 100 (39/39) | 97 (193/198) | 100 (193/193) |
a
“n” indicates the ∑ correct identification of the given species, “N” indicates the ∑ expected identification of the given species, and “Ni” indicates the ∑ correct and incorrect identifications of the given species. NA, not applicable.