Table 3.

Class-Conditional Response Probabilities of Five-Class Model from Second-Order Latent Class

	Overall sample	Healthful concordant	Healthful but TV/outdoors/junk food	Discord ant	Unfavorable concordant	Unfavorable low cost
Population share		19%	17%	30%	17%	17%
Wave 1
Mostly healthful except sleep°	0.20	0.22	0.23	0.24	0.12	0.14
Generally unfavorable°	0.20	0.05	0.06	0.21	0.37	0.35
Generally healthful°	0.33	0.61	0.55	0.27	0.14	0.11
Unfavorable food/smoking°	0.27	0.12	0.16	0.29	0.37	0.39
Wave 2
Middle°	0.14	0.14	0.20 *	0.15	0.15	0.04 *
Middle, unfavorable food/TV°	0.19	0.06 *	0.07*	0.24*	0.18	0.37 *
Generally unfavorable°	0.19	0.01	0.04	0.18	0.46	0.29
Generally healthful°	0.48	0.79	0.69	0.43	0.21	0.29
Wave 3
Mid. low-cost°	0.10	0.06*	0.03*	0.19 *	0.01 *	0.16*
Generally unfavorable°	0.17	0.02	0.04	0.04	0.37	0.49
Generally healthful°	0.24	0.90	0.03	0.17	0.01	0.04
Middle°	0.35	0.00 *	0.31*	0.55 *	0.52*	0.26*
Healthful/mid except junk food°	0.14	0.02*	0.59 *	0.05*	0.10*	0.05 *
Wave Kindergarten
Healthful except junk food°	0.17	0.30*	0.48 *	0.05*	0.08*	0.00 *
Unfavorable/safety°	0.16	0.01	0.06	0.15	0.57	0.00
Unfavorable/junk food/TV°	0.16	0.03	0.09	0.03	0.22	0.56
Generally healthful°	0.09	0.29	0.06	0.08	0.00	0.02
Healthful/middle°	0.19	0.34 *	0.22*	0.26*	0.05*	0.03 *
Unfavorable/middle, low-cost°	0.23	0.03 *	0.11*	0.43 *	0.08*	0.40*

Source: ECLS-B

Notes: Accounts for complex survey design. N≈6,550.

^°1=yes, 0=no.

^●No means were significantly different from sample mean. Gray=significantly healthier than sample mean, red=significantly unhealthier than sample mean, white=not significantly different from sample mean for that indicator, highest/lowest values are bolded.

^*Signiiicantly different from sample mean for rows not color coded because healthfulness of behavior is less well established.