Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 26;10:2021-6-6. doi: 10.7573/dic.2021-6-6

Table 5.

Detailed characteristics of phase III trials.

Author, year, type of study Time of study N (total) Intrinsic subtypes TLDM Treatment Other therapies (ITT, ET, ChT, RT) Safety CNS-specific response Survival
Boogerd et al. (2004)65
Phase III
1991–1998 35 BC pts with LMD (study closed prematurely because of poor accrual in the IT arm) IT arm: systemic therapy plus IF/RT (30 Gy/10 fr) plus IT MTX
Non-IT arm: systemic therapy (CAF, FEC and CMF) plus IF/RT (30 Gy/10 fr)
Yes Delayed leukoencephalopathy 18% (IT) vs 6% (non-IT)
Serious gait disturbance 65% (IT) vs 28% (non-IT)
Moderate headache 41% (IT) vs 22% (non-IT)
Moderate cognitive impairment 53% (IT) vs 22% (non-IT)
Neurological complications 47% (IT) vs 6% (non-IT) (p=0.0072)
1 death in the IT group after Ommaya reservoir insertion and before MTX infusion
Neurological improvement: 41% (IT) vs 39% (non-IT)
Neurological stabilization = 18% vs 28%
Mean time to neurological progression in responders = 43 weeks (IT) vs 64 weeks (non-IT)
mOS 18.3 weeks in the IT arm vs 30.33 weeks in the non-IT arm (p=0.32)
mOS of 6 IT patients who achieved cytological response 52 weeks
Le Rhun et al. (2020)66
Phase III
DEPOSEIN trial
2011–2018 73 pts In the control arm: 7 pts TNBC (19%), 9 pts HER2+ (24%) – 24 patients ER+ (65%) – 18 PR+ (29%)
In the experimental arm: 5 TNBC (14%) – 2 HER2+ (6%) 27 ER+ (75%) – 24 PR+ (67%)
4.5 years in the control arm
7.3 years in the experimental arm
4.7 years in all patients
Control arm: systemic therapy
Experimental arm: systemic therapy plus intrathecal liposomal cytarabine 50 mg every 14 days for 2 months (5 total injections) followed by monthly injection of 50 mg until PD
Yes No significant differences in the incidence of severe (G3 or higher) AEs between the two groups Median LM PFS in the ITT: 2.2 (control) vs 3.8 (experimental) (HR 0.61; p=0.04)
Clinical LM response in the ITT: improvement 3% vs 17%; stabilization 81% vs 72%, deterioration 11% vs 11%, missing 5% vs 0%
Radiological LM response in the ITT: PR 8% vs 19%, SD 32% vs 56%, PD 30% vs 14%, missing 30% vs 11%
Overall PFS in the ITT: 2.0 months (control) vs 2.4 months (experimental) (HR 0.66; p=0.09)
OS in the ITT: 4.0 months (control) vs 7.3 months (experimental) (HR 0.85; p=0.051)

BC, breast cancer; CAF, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil; CMF, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil; FEC, 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, cyclophosphamide; IF/RT, involved field radiotherapy; IT, intrathecal; MTX, methotrexate.