Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Proc Int Conf Image Proc. 2020 Sep 30;2020:355–359. doi: 10.1109/ICIP40778.2020.9190818

Table 2.

Summary of comparison of the ability to diagnose renal allograft status between RT-CAD using Ibmrks versus the six other tactics (T1, T2, T3, T4,T5, T6). Here, accuracy is ACC, sensitivity is Sens, specificity is Spec, and area under the curve is AUC.

Tactic Acc% Sens% Spec% AUC
T1(Dmrks) 80.9 76.5 83.3 0.84
T2(Bmrks) 86.7 80.0 90.0 0.84
T3(Cbmrks) 70.2 80.0 52.9 0.71
T4(DBmrks) 90.0 90.0 90.0 0.90
T5(DCmrks) 87.2 82.4 90.0 0.88
T6(BCmrks) 90.0 80.0 95.0 0.88
RT-CAD(Ibmrks) 93.3 90.0 95.0 0.92