TABLE 1.
Further differentiation of RFLP types (10 or more isolates of each type) by spoligotyping showing the species distribution of the different spoligotypes identified within each RFLP type and the geographic distribution of the RFLP types
| RFLP type (no. of isolates) | Spoligotype (no. of isolates) | Species distribution of spoligotypes (species, no. of animals) | Geographic distribution of RFLP types
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of adjoining counties in which RFLP type was clustereda | % of isolates with RFLP type in region | |||
| A1,A1,A (88) | A1 (86) | Cattle, 48; badger, 21; deer, 8; other isolates, 9b | Not clustered | |
| A9 (1) | Badger, 1 | |||
| B4 (1) | Deer, 1 | |||
| C1,H1,J (56) | D1 (56) | Cattle, 22; badger, 32; deer, 2 | 7 | 98 |
| B1,C1,C (54) | A2 (50) | Cattle, 26; badger, 24 | 3 | 94 |
| A1 (3) | Badger, 3 | |||
| B2 (1) | Badger, 1 | |||
| A1,A5,A (39) | A1 (38) | Cattle, 14; badger, 20; deer, 3; other isolates, 1c | 1 | 67 |
| B1 (1) | Pig, 1 | |||
| A2,A1,B (27) | A1 (19) | Cattle, 11; badger, 7; sheep, 1 | Not clustered | |
| B2 (6) | Cattle, 5; badger, 1 | |||
| B4 (1) | Cattle, 1 | |||
| B1 (1) | Badger, 1 | |||
| A1,A3,A (20) | A1 (20) | Cattle, 8; badger, 12 | 3 | 95 |
| J1,A1,A (13) | A1 (12) | Cattle, 7; badger, 5 | 5 | 100 |
| B1 (1) | Badger, 1 | |||
| A1,A1,F (10) | A8 (10) | Cattle, 8; badger, 2 | 3 | 70 |
| A1,B1,D (10) | A1 (8) | Cattle, 5; badger, 1; deer, 2 | Not clustered | |
| A2 (1) | Deer, 1 | |||
| B2 (1) | Badger, 1 | |||
a
The mean area of a county is 2,650 km2.
b
Pig, 6; sheep, 2; goat, 1.
c
Sheep, 1.