Table 2.
Assessment of reporting quality by QUADAS-2 scoring system
Study | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | Flow and timing | Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | |
Kim et al., 201323 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Hur et al., 200919 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk |
Inoue et al., 201221 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | High risk | High risk | High risk | High risk |
Yamagami et al., 201324 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk |
Maxwell et al., 201425 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Yun et al., 201827 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk |
Kiranantawat et al., 201928 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk |
Munir et al., 201726 | High risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk |
Kim et al., 200818 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | High risk | Low risk | High risk | High risk |
Lu et al., 201222 | Low risk | Unclear risk | High risk | Low risk | High risk | Unclear risk | High risk |
Yamauchi et al., 201120 | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
Halpenny et al., 202029 | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
QUADAS, Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.