Table 4.
Effect of normative views A and B and perceived compliance on social trust change.
| DV: Social Trust2020 – Social Trust2019 | Model 2.1 | Model 2.2 | Model 2.3 | Model 2.4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norm A | −0.078 | (0.054) | −0.078 | (0.054) | ||||
| Perceived compliance with norm A | 0.054* | (0.023) | 0.058 | (0.103) | ||||
| Norm B | −0.204*** | (0.045) | −0.203*** | (0.045) | ||||
| Perceived compliance with norm B | 0.054* | (0.021) | 0.043 | (0.071) | ||||
| R has been infected | 0.054 | (0.171) | 0.054 | (0.171) | 0.047 | (0.170) | 0.046 | (0.170) |
| R has n contacts who are infected | 0.014 | (0.042) | 0.015 | (0.042) | 0.020 | (0.042) | 0.020 | (0.042) |
| R is in a high-risk category | −0.258* | (0.101) | −0.258* | (0.101) | −0.238* | (0.101) | −0.238* | (0.101) |
| Perceived chance of being infected | −0.002 | (0.046) | −0.002 | (0.046) | −0.001 | (0.046) | −0.001 | (0.046) |
| Norm A*Perceived compliance norm A | −0.001 | (0.024) | ||||||
| Norm B*Perceived compliance norm B |
0.003 |
(0.019) |
||||||
| Demographics | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Date of fieldwork | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Province |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
| Constant | 0.472 | (0.422) | 0.474 | (0.423) | 0.824* | (0.384) | 0.818* | (0.386) |
| N | 2377 | 2377 | 2377 | 2377 | ||||
Note. OLS regressions with robust standard errors in parentheses. Perceived compliance with norm A and B are centered around the mean. LISS sample, Netherlands 2019–2020. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001 (for two-sided tests).