Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;151:110655. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110655

Table 3.

Year 2020 (during the first peak of the COVID-19) versus year 2018 and other associations with somatic symptom severity (n = 2049).

r b SE β t p 95% CI
Constant 1.901 .179 11.13 <.0001 1.565 to 2.202
Demographics
Gender .26 .165 .037 .069 4.48 <.0001 .095 to .242
Age −.02 .000 .001 −.004 −.27 .79 −.002 to .001
Education −.25 −.081 .034 −.040 −2.58 .01 −.167 to .011
Number of (comorbid) diseases .43 .206 .013 .243 15.12 <.0001 .177 to .236
Group .58 .612 .154 .291 4.04 <.0001 .317 to .999
Year −.15 −.354 .181 −.160 −2.06 .04 −.772 to .079
Psychological flexibility −.51 −.008 .001 −.395 −11.37 <.0001 −.010 to −.006
Year × Group .41 −.087 .070 −.037 −1.24 .22 −.246 to .029
Year × Psychological flexibility −.31 .001 .001 .076 .94 .35 −.001 to .002
Group × Psychological flexibility .50 .001 .001 .143 2.19 .03 .000 to .003

Pearson correlations (r) and results of the linear regression analysis with bootstrapping examining the association of somatic symptom severity (SF-36) with gender (0 = men, 1 = women), age, education level, number of (comorbid) diseases, group, year (0 = 2018, 1 = 2020), psychological flexibility and two-way interactions.

b, unstandardized regression coefficient; SE, Standard Error; β, standardized beta; t, t-test statistic; CI, confidence interval of unstandardized regression coefficient.

Education level: 0 = low: lower general secondary education or lower; 1 = high: higher general secondary education or higher.

Group: 0 = non-CSS; 1 = CSS: people with a central sensitivity syndrome.

Pearson correlation with somatic symptom severity was significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).