Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 10;120(20):4399–4417. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.09.006

Table 3.

Comparison of rate and equilibrium constants for nucleation reactions from the standard model with and without reversible severing and with modeling the elongation reactions in two different ways

Standard Annealing and severing Tetramer from two dimers
k+1 (μM−1 s−1) 3.5 (1.2–11) × 10−6 1.9 (0.79–5.2) × 10−6 2.8 (1.4–16) × 10−6
k−1 (s−1) 0.041 (0.036–0.047) 0.014 (0.012–0.016) 0.050 (0.045–0.056)
Kd of dimer (μM) 12,000 (3300–39,000) 7400 (2300–20,000) 18,000 (2800–40,000)
k+2 (μM−1 s−1) 1.3 (0.40–4.0) × 10−4 55 (3.7–2900) × 10−4 0.51 (0.094–0.99) × 10−4
k−2 (s−1) 22 (19–25) 5100 (440–9,500,000) (<0.64)
Kd of trimer (μM) 1.7 (0.48–6.3) × 105 930,000 (1500–26,000,000,000) (<68,000)
k+S (s−1) 2.5 (2.3–2.7) × 10−4
k−S (μM−1 s−1) 2.4 (2.0–2.8)
K of annealing (μM) 9600 (7400–12,000)
k+3 (μM−1 s−1) 0.23 (0.0071–1.2)
k−3 (s−1) (<5.0)
Kd of tetramer to dimer (μM) (<700)

Best-fit values are followed by 95% CIs in parentheses. For parameters that are not identifiable, we did not include the best-fit value for they were unrealistically small (1.1 × 1015 for k−2, 2.2 × 10−11 for Kd of trimer, 4.7 × 10−17 for k−3, and 4.7 × 10−17 for Kd of tetramer to dimer) but do include their upper boundary in parentheses.