Table 2.
ANOVA analyses for the eye-tracking data by regions: The intercept is also given since a significant intercept indicates that the grand mean is significantly different from 0, Experiments 1 and 2.
Regions | Effect | F1 (df = 1,31) | F2 (df = 1,23) | P 1 | P 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment 1 | |||||
Verb | Intercept | 36.06 | 42.30 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Tense | 46.12 | 42.11 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Gaze | 21.42 | 5.67 | 0.000 | 0.041 | |
Interaction | .754 | 12.70 | 0.392 | 0.002 | |
Adv | Intercept | 74.00 | 59.05 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Tense | 76.33 | 93.82 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Gaze | 2.59 | 0.47 | 0.118 | 0.500 | |
Interaction | 1.53 | 3.61 | 0.226 | 0.070 | |
NP2 | Intercept | 3.57 | 4.43 | 0.068 | 0.047 |
Tense | 132.14 | 155.63 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Gaze | 0.931 | 1.913 | 0.342 | 0.180 | |
Interaction | 2.65 | 4.09 | 0.113 | 0.055 | |
Experiment 2 | |||||
Verb | Intercept | 40.39 | 72.09 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Tense | 0.37 | 0.59 | 0.544 | 0.448 | |
Adv | Intercept | 29.49 | 92.75 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Tense | 7.29 | 15.55 | 0.011 | 0.001 | |
NP2 | Intercept | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.734 | 0.743 |
Tense | 18.62 | 24.54 | 0.000 | 0.000 |