Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 15;12:701742. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701742

Table 2.

ANOVA analyses for the eye-tracking data by regions: The intercept is also given since a significant intercept indicates that the grand mean is significantly different from 0, Experiments 1 and 2.

Regions Effect F1 (df = 1,31) F2 (df = 1,23) P 1 P 2
Experiment 1
Verb Intercept 36.06 42.30 0.000 0.000
Tense 46.12 42.11 0.000 0.000
Gaze 21.42 5.67 0.000 0.041
Interaction .754 12.70 0.392 0.002
Adv Intercept 74.00 59.05 0.000 0.000
Tense 76.33 93.82 0.000 0.000
Gaze 2.59 0.47 0.118 0.500
Interaction 1.53 3.61 0.226 0.070
NP2 Intercept 3.57 4.43 0.068 0.047
Tense 132.14 155.63 0.000 0.000
Gaze 0.931 1.913 0.342 0.180
Interaction 2.65 4.09 0.113 0.055
Experiment 2
Verb Intercept 40.39 72.09 0.000 0.000
Tense 0.37 0.59 0.544 0.448
Adv Intercept 29.49 92.75 0.000 0.000
Tense 7.29 15.55 0.011 0.001
NP2 Intercept 0.12 0.11 0.734 0.743
Tense 18.62 24.54 0.000 0.000