Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;152:311–319. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2021.10.027

Table 3.

Performance comparison of lung dataset.

Methods A F1 R P AUC
AFS-DF [34] 87.12% 87.69% 92.82% 83.09% 92.71%
CAD [14] 90.24% 89.58% 93.34% 86.11% 95.33%
COVNet [16] 94.65% 94.31% 96.51% 92.21% 97.12%
EfficientNet [15] 94.32% 94.68% 95.66% 93.72% 97.61%
proposed 96.80% 96.43% 96.50% 96.37% 98.86%