Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 16;7(10):e08194. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08194

Table 5.

Differentially abundant genera in fecal samples with high versus low composite EED scores.

Genus log2Fold
Change
lfcSE p valuea padjb ORc (95%CI) p valuec
Succinivibrio -26.3 2.6 <0.001 <0.001 0.14 (0.08,0.23) <0.001
Butyrivibrio -25.6 2.9 <0.001 <0.001 3.52 (0.68,18.16) 0.791
Enterococcus 23.5 2.9 <0.001 <0.001 1.82 (0.25,1.2) 0.619

OR = odds ratio.

CI = confidence interval.

lfcSE = log fold change Standard Error obtained with a differential abundance analysis.

a

Denotes unadjusted p value obtained with differential abundance analysis while.

b

denotes p value obtained with differential abundance analysis after adjusting for multiplicity with Benjamin-Hochberg p value correction.

c

Denotes OR (95%CI) and p values obtained with zero-inflated negative binomial regression (conditional model) after adjusting for age and sex.