Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 15;11:739092. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.739092

Table 4.

Axiological analysis of the articles of the systematic review.

Author, year of publication End of life care Decision making (Who, when, how) Ethical values Epistemic values Ethical argumentation
Armstrong (14) Avoid medical futility Families and health professionals when risk-benefit relationship is high Human dignity, autonomy, justive To create a better definition of medical futility Principialist bioethics, utilitarianism
Cicero (15) Avoid medical futility Pediatric oncologists and parents, at end of life, inducing medical futility in patients Responsibility, mature minor doctrine Encourage participation of adolescents with cancer in decision making at end-of-life, to avoid futile treatments Principialist bioethics
Coyne (16) All along disease care Shared decision making between health professionals, parents and children with cancer throughout the treatment Autonomy, best interests of children Increase participation of children with cancer in decision-making during treatment, implement controlled clinical studies that support involvement of children in decision-making Best interests of children
Delany (17) Withdraw or withhold life support treatments Shared decisions between health professionals and parents of critically illness children Medical responsibility, honesty Improve communication between parents and health professionals, using a textbook that help in decision-making Medical responsibility
Lotto (19) Treatment refusal, withdraw/withhold medical treatment at end-of-life Medical doctors decide to withdraw/withhold treatment in patients with altered states of consciousness, based on patient free choice or sanctity of life Autonomy, human dignity, human rights Demonstrate a predictable correlation between the physicians’ moral principles and the agreement to withdraw life support treatment in patients who request it Moral and ethical principles
Hilden (18) Palliative care, end-of-life, euthanasia, and medically assisted suicide Pediatric oncologists make decisions at end-of-life with poor knowledge about palliative care, medical ethics, euthanasia, and other medical decisions Beneficence, dignity, human rights Improve ethical training in pediatric oncologists for the better decision making at end-of-life Medical ethics, responsibility ethics
Sisk (20) Treatment refusal, abandonment, and adherence to treatment Shared decision-making between parents and medical doctors, along all disease process Justice, mature minor doctrine Increase access to care during illness in adolescents and young adult patients Principialist bioethics