Table 8.
Carcass characteristics of broilers fed diets with increased nutrient density and/or phytase supplementation from 1 to 41 D of age, Experiment 21.
| Carcass |
Total breast |
Wing |
Drum |
Thigh |
Abdominal fat |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Nutrient density2 | Phytase, FTU/kg3 | Weight, g | Yield, %4 | Weight, g | Yield, %4 | Weight, g | Yield, %4 | Weight, g | Yield, %4 | Weight, g | Yield,%4 | Weight, g | Percent, %4 |
| 1 | − | 0 | 2,249b | 74.60 | 795b | 26.38 | 224 | 7.43 | 265 | 8.79 | 281b | 9.33 | 36 | 1.21 |
| 2 | + | 0 | 2,259b | 74.23 | 784b | 25.75 | 229 | 7.51 | 270 | 8.89 | 287b | 9.42 | 39 | 1.27 |
| 3 | − | 4,500 | 2,269b | 74.78 | 805b | 26.41 | 228 | 7.53 | 269 | 8.88 | 285b | 9.40 | 35 | 1.17 |
| 4 | + | 4,500 | 2,376a | 74.84 | 838a | 26.38 | 239 | 7.54 | 282 | 8.90 | 305a | 9.62 | 38 | 1.21 |
| SEM5 | 19 | 0.28 | 9 | 0.20 | 2 | 0.04 | 3 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.04 | ||
| Main effect of nutrient density | ||||||||||||||
| − | 2,259 | 74.69 | 800 | 26.39 | 226 | 7.48 | 227 | 8.84 | 283 | 9.36 | 36 | 1.19 | ||
| + | 2,317 | 74.54 | 811 | 26.07 | 234 | 7.52 | 276 | 8.89 | 296 | 9.52 | 39 | 1.24 | ||
| SEM5 | 14 | 0.24 | 6 | 0.14 | 1 | 0.03 | 2 | 0.04 | 4 | 0.07 | 1 | 0.03 | ||
| Main effect of phytase | ||||||||||||||
| 0 | 2,254 | 74.42 | 790 | 26.06 | 226 | 7.47 | 267 | 8.84 | 284 | 9.38 | 37 | 1.24 | ||
| 4,500 | 2,322 | 74.81 | 821 | 26.40 | 234 | 7.53 | 276 | 8.89 | 295 | 9.51 | 37 | 1.19 | ||
| SEM5 | 13 | 0.24 | 6 | 0.14 | 1 | 0.03 | 2 | 0.04 | 4 | 0.07 | 1 | 0.03 | ||
| Source of variation | Probabilities | |||||||||||||
| Nutrient density × phytase | 0.005 | 0.237 | 0.009 | 0.117 | 0.091 | 0.271 | 0.094 | 0.404 | 0.018 | 0.362 | 0.718 | 0.713 | ||
| Treatment 1 vs. 3 | 0.427 | 0.474 | 0.471 | 0.895 | 0.066 | 0.057 | 0.165 | 0.175 | 0.375 | 0.523 | 0.544 | 0.382 | ||
| Treatment 2 vs. 4 | < 0.001 | 0.012 | < 0.001 | 0.014 | < 0.001 | 0.653 | < 0.001 | 0.808 | < 0.001 | 0.041 | 0.901 | 0.135 | ||
| Treatment 3 vs. 4 | < 0.001 | 0.822 | 0.006 | 0.916 | < 0.001 | 0.931 | < 0.001 | 0.788 | < 0.001 | 0.028 | 0.029 | 0.320 | ||
| Main effect of nutrient density | < 0.001 | 0.385 | 0.206 | 0.085 | < 0.001 | 0.220 | < 0.001 | 0.225 | < 0.001 | 0.028 | 0.006 | 0.076 | ||
| Main effect of phytase | < 0.001 | 0.026 | < 0.001 | 0.078 | < 0.001 | 0.088 | < 0.001 | 0.245 | < 0.001 | 0.064 | 0.596 | 0.098 | ||
Means not sharing a common superscript within column differ (P < 0.05).
Values are least-square means of 8 replicate pens with 14 birds selected from each pen for processing.
− = without increased nutrient density, + = with increased nutrient density; diets with increased nutrient density were formulated to contain 0.007, 0.015, 0.013, 0.021, 0.024%, and 61 kcal/kg higher digestible SAA, Lys, Thr, Val, Ile concentrations, and AMEn (obtained from Experiment 1), respectively, compared with the control diet.
One unit of phytase activity (FTU) is the quantity of enzyme to liberate 1 µmol of inorganic phosphate per minute from 0.0051 mol/L sodium phytate at pH 5.5 and 37°C.
Percent yield was calculated based on weight proportion to bird live weight at 40 d of age.
Pooled standard error of the mean.