Skip to main content
Poultry Science logoLink to Poultry Science
. 2021 Sep 22;100(12):101497. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101497

Research Note: Effect of age on hematological parameter and reference intervals for commercial Lohmann silver layer

Ding Hong *,1, Chang Liyun *,1, LI Fuwei , Yue Qiaoxian *, Wang Dehe *, Zhou Rongyan *,2, Chen Hui *
PMCID: PMC8554261  PMID: 34695637

Abstract

Hematological parameters play a key role in assessing the disease states and physiological status of birds, however the reliable information of hematological reference values for Lohmann silver in the pre- and post-laying periods is limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to research the effect of age on hematological parameters and provide reliable reference intervals for commercial Lohmann silver layer. Blood samples were obtained from 231 laying hens at different ages (5–37 wk) with 4-wk sampling intervals. A total of 12 hematological parameters including leucocytes (WBC, 109/L), red blood cell (RBC,1012/L), hemoglobin (HGB, g/L), hematocrit (HCT,%), mean corpuscular volume (MCV, fL), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH, pg), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, g/L), red cell distribution width (RDW,%), platelet count (PLT,109/L), mean platelet volume (MPV, fL), platelet volume distribution width (PDW), plateletcrit (PCT, fL) were determined with a reference value advisor. One-ANOVA and Tukey test were utilized to test for significant differences of each parameter between ages. Our findings showed that these parameters were significantly affected by age, except for HCT in the pre-laying period. And reference intervals for all parameters except MCH, MCHC, MCV, MPV, and PDW in the pre-laying period were higher than that in the post-laying period. The results of this study may serve as indispensable information when diagnosing the health of Lohmann silver layer.

Key words: Lohmann silver layer, reference interval, hematological parameter

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, increasing attention has been paid to hematological characteristics in avian since hematological parameters play a key role in assessing the health as well as the physiological status of birds (Etim et al., 2014). The factors such as age, breed, sex, management systems, and season affect the value of hematological parameters (Addass et al., 2012; Irivboje et al., 2020). Although normal hematological values of some chickens have been determined based on different factors, there is little information about the reference values of hematology for Lohmann silver (Nanbol et al., 2016; Al-Nedawi, 2018).

Lohmann silver is a predominately white feathering layer for production of uniform brown eggs with small egg size. Providing an accurate reference interval for Lohmann silver may facilitate the development of genetic selection if correlated with production parameters. Besides, providing reference intervals for selected hematological parameters may have some assistance in identifying disease states and general physiologic abnormalities. Recently, the reference value advisor was utilized to determine hematological and biochemical reference intervals for broilers (Al-Nedawi, 2018). Unfortunately, limited studies on reference hematology existed for commercial Lohmann silver layer in the pre- and post-laying periods. In this study, we investigated the effect of age on hematological parameters and provided reference values for Lohmann silver in the pre- and post-laying periods, and the hematology values in this paper may serve as crucial information when trying to diagnosis the health of Lohmann silver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chickens and Procedures

In this study, a total of 231 commercial Lohmann silver laying hens were used for collection of blood samples, which included 80 pre-laying chickens at 5 to 17 wk and 151 post-laying chickens at 21 to 37 wk. Chickens at 5 to 9 wk were raised in solid hatchling cage and they were transferred to 3-tiered cages with 3 birds in each cage after 9 wk. Chickens were fed pelleted before 6 wk and chickens at 6 to 15 wk were kept under common powder diet formulation and management systems used in the production company. A total of 231 commercial Lohmann silver layer at 5 (n = 20), 9 (n = 20), 13 (n = 20), 17 (n = 20), 21 (n = 31), 25 (n = 30), 29 (n = 30), 33 (n = 30), and 37 (n = 30) week of age were selected for sampling. Chickens were free of disease and death during rearing and were vaccinated in accordance with the management guide for Lohmann silver layers provided by LOHMANN TIERZUCHT.

Hematological Testing

Blood (1 mL–3 mL) was collected from the brachial vein into a disposable 5 mL tube with anticoagulant heparin sodium. The hematological parameters were obtained with an automated hematology analyzer (mindray BC-2800Vet). Leucocytes (WBC, 109/L), red blood cell (RBC,1012/L), hemoglobin (HGB, g/L), Hematocrit (HCT,%), mean corpuscular volume (MCV, fL), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH, pg), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, g/L), red cell distribution width (RDW,%), platelet count (PLT,109/L) and the following platelet parameters: mean platelet volume (MPV, fL), platelet volume distribution width (PDW), plateletcrit (PCT, fL) were determined in this study.

This study was carried out in keeping with the institutional and national guidelines and were supported by the Animal Use and Ethics Committee of the Agricultural University of Hebei (University Identification Number: HB/2019/03).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics consisting of sample size, mean, median, standard deviation (SD), minimum, and maximum values, confidence intervals (CI), and hematological reference intervals for commercial Lohmann silver layer were computed in Microsoft Excel 2013 using Reference Value Advisor V2.1. A statistical package (SPSS version 11.0 for Windows) was utilized to perform statistical ANOVA and Tukey test for each of the 12 applicable hematological parameters to test for significant differences between ages.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Descriptive statistics (mean, SD, minimum, maximum, 90% CI for lower and upper limit) and hematological reference intervals for commercial Lohman silver layer during the pre-laying and post-laying periods are included in Table 1. Eighty samples were available in the pre-laying period and 151 samples were available in the post-laying period. Reference intervals for all parameters except MCH, MCHC, MCV, MPV, and PDW in the pre-laying period were higher than that in the post-laying period. The comparisons of blood hematological parameters among weeks during the pre-laying and post-laying periods are in Table 2. The hematology of Lohmann silver layers showed significant differences concerning age, except for HCT in the pre-laying period. HCT was within the range from 25 to 45%.

Table 1.

Hematological reference intervals of commercial Lohmann silver layer at 5–17 and 21–37 wk.

Analyte SI units RI 90% CI for lower limit 90% CI for upper limit RI 90% CI for lower limit 90% CI for upper limit
5–17 wk 21–37 wk
WBC 109/L 206.862–288.016 201.023–212.953 281.599–294.173 193.684–259.606 190.218–197.275 255.821–263.246
RBC 1012/L 2.397–3.135 2.341–2.454 3.081–3.197 2.004–2.784 1.960–2.048 2.733–2.829
HGB g/L 117.624–181.801 112.621–122.933 176.489–187.097 112.000–173.600 87.000–115.000 161.000–181.000
HCT % 30.243–38.482 29.580–30.881 37.846–39.214 24.069–35.207 23.257–24.930 34.705–35.771
MCV fL 118.748–130.185 117.757–119.586 129.275–131.047 117.845–137.745 117.016–118.760 136.149–139.238
MCH pg 48.303–64.978 47.500–48.705 61.795–65.300 47.925–73.884 47.045–48.717 71.468–77.455
MCHC g/L 357.441–508.994 348.962–367.883 496.036–522.548 384.000–586.000 373.000–392.000 570.000–650.000
RDW % 7.323–8.922 7.192–7.446 8.799–9.047 6.600–8.900 6.600–6.800 8.400–9.900
PLT 109/L 14.291–88.882 12.636–16.591 77.641–100.516 8.186–59.253 7.089–9.474 54.073–64.227
MPV fL 3.884–7.138 3.613–4.139 6.874–7.426 4.100–6.500 3.700–4.200 6.300–7.000
PDW 15.480–20.453 15.107–15.908 20.085–20.855 16.663–20.390 16.456–16.882 20.164–20.611
PCT % 0.008–0.058 0.004–0.009 0.048–0.091 0.005–0.030 0.005–0.006 0.023–0.185

Abbreviations: HCT, hematocrit; HGB, hemoglobin; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MPV, mean platelet volume; PCT, plateletcrit; PDW, platelet volume distribution width; RBC, red blood cell; WBC, leucocytes.

Table 2.

Effect of age on hematological parameters.

Analyte SI units 5–17 wk
21–37 wk
5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37
WBC 109/L 220.65 ± 9.52D 242.64 ± 7.08C 253.83 ± 6.83B 272.65 ± 5.22A 209.96 ± 12.19C 214.32 ± 12.98C 225.67 ± 6.41B 241.78 ± 7.57A 209.96 ± 12.19C
RBC 1012/L 2.66 ± 0.16B 2.74 ± 0.16AB 2.84 ± 0.17A 2.83 ± 0.20A 2.319 ± 0.21Bb 2.47 ± 0.20Aa 2.38 ± 0.12ABab 2.46 ± 0.20Aa 2.32 ± 0.21Bb
HGB g/L 131.70 ± 6.88D 144.45 ± 6.80C 152.15 ± 7.92B 170.55 ± 8.78A 131.84 ± 12.38B 129.57 ± 10.63BC 124.67 ± 6.72C 153.10 ± 9.91A 131.84 ± 12.38B
HCT % 33.84 ± 1.84 34.12 ± 2.11 34.53 ± 2.06 34.97 ± 2.18 30.48 ± 3.48ABb 31.95 ± 2.59Aa 29.67 ± 1.40BCbc 30.18 ± 2.57ABCb 30.48 ± 3.48ABb
MCV fL 127.60 ± 1.78A 124.53 ± 1.55B 121.81 ± 2.04C 123.93 ± 2.46B 132.77 ± 2.67Aa 130.07 ± 3.61Bb 124.77 ± 2.91Cc 123.17 ± 2.77Cd 132.77 ± 2.67Aa
MCH pg 49.57 ± 0.99C 52.66 ± 1.44B 53.59 ± 1.42B 60.37 ± 2.48A 56.71 ± 3.47C 52.37 ± 2.40D 52.28 ± 1.85D 62.50 ± 4.24B 56.71 ± 3.47C
MCHC g/L 388.70 ± 7.06D 423.45 ± 11.71C 441.00 ± 10.67B 487.70 ± 15.21A 427.71 ± 21.93Cc 405.23 ± 18.27Dd 419.70 ± 11.32CDc 508.27 ± 34.44Bb 427.71 ± 21.93Cc
RDW % 7.96 ± 0.46b 8.10 ± 0.40ab 8.14 ± 0.34ab 8.30 ± 0.35a 7.93 ± 0.62Aa 7.72 ± 0.36ABa 7.46 ± 0.32Bb 7.45 ± 0.41Bb 7.93 ± 0.62Aa
PLT 109/L 24.80 ± 7.11C 36.90 ± 10.15B 36.00 ± 15.89B 62.25 ± 16.33A 20.71 ± 7.35Cc 34.50 ± 14.55ABa 14.00 ± 6.52Cd 36.73 ± 12.57Aa 20.71 ± 7.35Cc
MPV fL 6.34 ± 0.63A 4.74 ± 0.31C 5.07 ± 0.59C 5.90 ± 0.44B 5.61 ± 0.47Aa 4.58 ± 0.33Dd 5.51 ± 0.59ABa 4.85 ± 0.50CDc 5.61 ± 0.47Aa
PDW 19.45 ± 0.77Aa 17.61 ± 0.64BCb 17.87 ± 0.92Bb 16.94 ± 0.99Cc 19.47 ± 0.73Aa 18.81 ± 0.6Bb 18.36 ± 0.77BCc 17.97 ± 0.70Cd 19.47 ± 0.73Aa
PCT % 0.01 ± 0.00B 0.02 ± 0.00B 0.02 ± 0.01B 0.04 ± 0.02A 0.01 ± 0.00B 0.02 ± 0.01AB 0.01 ± 0.00B 0.02 ± 0.03A 0.01 ± 0.00B

Abbreviations: HCT, hematocrit; HGB, hemoglobin; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MPV, mean platelet volume; PCT, plateletcrit; PDW, platelet volume distribution width; RBC, red blood cell; WBC, leucocytes.

Note: Superscript lettering A,B,C,D indicates statistically significant differences between ages (P < 0.01) and superscript lettering a,b,c,d indicates statistically significant differences between ages (P < 0.05) when letter is not shared.

Data are means ± SD.

In the pre-laying period, there was a highly statistically significant increase among ages regarding the WBC, HGB, MCH, and MCHC. The increasing trend of WBC with the advancement of age was reported (Addass et al., 2012). However, a negative relationship between WBC and age was found (Onyishi et al., 2017). The increased value of HGB with age in the pre-laying period might because of the advancement in oxygen consumption for higher activity when the hens matured. HGB decreased close to the peak laying period and then rebounded. This could explain why the blood parameters related to oxygen transport are easy to change during laying period and the reproduction status influenced some hematological parameters. MCH is dependent on HGB. Consequently, the similar fluctuation of MCH during the rearing period is not surprised. On the other hand, the results of MCHC in our study differ from Onyishi et al. (2017) who reported that age did not affect MCHC.

A significant increase was recorded between 5 wk and 13 wk in RBC. Addass et al. (2012) found that there were lower RBC values at a younger age, which was also demonstrated in our study. Adversely, these data differ from that obtained by Gryzinska et al. (2013) who found that the level of RBC was higher at a younger age. In the post-laying period, our findings suggest that erythrocyte values increased near the peak of egg production comparing with that at the beginning of laying, and then the values decreased. MCV refers to the average volume of one red blood cell. The decreased values of MCV whether in the pre- or the post-laying period shown in this study agree with Rasheed and Olusegun (2017). This might be as a result of increased values of RBC. Besides the increased level of RDW in the pre-laying period is also similar to that study as above described, although an inverse trend of RDW existed in the post-laying period. The erythrocytic values are within the scope of the previous study (Talebi et al., 2005).

Although the function of thrombocyte in bird is not completely explained, the hemostatic effect is clear (Jones, 2015). Therefore, an in-depth understanding of the changes in blood parameters related to the coagulation system can help to better explain the physiological or pathological conditions of laying hens. In the pre-laying period, PLT and PCT presented an increasing trend, which is also confirmed by Gryzinska et al. (2013). PDW reflects the dispersion of platelet volume size, and reduced PDW indicates high platelet homogeneity. Unlike PLT and PCT, PDW decreased with the age of hens during the rearing period. The results of this study indicate that the homogeneity of platelets in hens is high. The range of values associated with blood clottings such as PLT, PCT, MPV, and PDW in this study is similar to the previous report (Gryzinska et al., 2013), whereas the values of PDW was higher than that obtained in this study.

In conclusion, ages affect hematological parameters, both in the pre- and post-laying periods. Moreover, reference values based on the factor of age in this study are likely to provide key information to assess the health status and to diagnosis the disease of Lohmann silver. Additional studies are needed to confirm whether these reference intervals are influenced by other underlying factors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project (MSTIP): the Research and Demonstration on Key Technologies of Precision Breeding and Management of Laying Hens (2019JZZY020611), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-40).

DISCLOSURES

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Addass P.A., David D.L., Edward A., Zira K.E., Midau A. Effect of age, sex and management system on some haematological parameters of intensively and semi-intensively kept chicken in Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria. Iranian J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2012;2:277–282. [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Nedawi A.M. Reference hematology for commercial Ross 308 broilers (Iraq) Online J. Vet. Res. 2018;22:566–570. [Google Scholar]
  3. Etim N.N., Williams M.E., Akpabio U., Offiong E.E. Haematological parameters and factors affecting their values. Agric. Sci. 2014;2:37–47. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gryzinska M., Krauze M., Klebaniuk R., Strachecka A. Influence of gender and age on haematological indicators of Polbar’s breed chickens. Acta Vet. 2013;63:601–608. [Google Scholar]
  5. Irivboje Y.I., Fafiolu A.O., Sanni M.T., Irivboje O.A., Ikeobi C.O.N. Comparative effect of genotype and season on the haematological profile of two laying chicken strains in southwest Nigeria. Agric. Trop. Subtrop. 2020;53:13–18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones M.P. Avian hematology. Vet. Clin. Exotic Anim. Pract. 2015;18:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2014.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nanbol D.L., Duru B.N., Nanbol H.D., Abiliu C.A., Anueyegu D.M., Kumbish P.R., Solomon M. Establishment of reference values for some biochemical and haematological parameters for broilers and layers in Plateau state Nigeria. Vom J. Vet. Sci. 2016;11:30–35. [Google Scholar]
  8. Onyishi G.C., Oguine C.C., Nwani S.I., Aguzie I.O., Nwani C.D. Haematological parameters dynamics of developing Gallus gallus domesticus. Anim. Res. Int. 2017;14:2769–2776. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rasheed A.S., Olusegun O.S. Influence of age and strain on haematological and blood biochemical indices in broiler chickens reared in derived Savanna environment of Nigeria. Am. J. Biol. Life Sci. 2017;5:34–38. [Google Scholar]
  10. Talebi A., Asri-Rezaei S., Rozeh-Chai R., Sahraei R. Comparative studies on haematological values of broiler strains (Ross, Cobb, Arbor-acres and Arian) Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005;4:573–579. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Poultry Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES