Skip to main content
. 1999 Oct;37(10):3255–3259. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.10.3255-3259.1999

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of clustered and nonclustered patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis

Characteristic Total (n = 201) (%) Clustered (n = 41) (%) Not clustered (n = 160) (%) P valuea
Male sex 131 (65) 32 (78) 99 (62) 0.07
Ethnicity 0.06
 White 29 (14) 7 (17) 22 (14)
 African American 28 (14) 11 (27) 17 (11)
 Hispanic 116 (58) 19 (46) 97 (61)
 Asian 27 (13) 4 (10) 23 (14)
Age in years 0.45
 <15 3 (1) 1 (2) 2 (1)
 15–24 21 (10) 2 (5) 19 (12)
 25–44 107 (53) 24 (59) 83 (52)
 >44 70 (35) 14 (34) 56 (35)
Country of birth 0.06
 United States 75 (37) 22 (63) 53 (39)
 Mexico 62 (31) 9 (26) 53 (39)
 Vietnam 17 (8) 3 (9) 14 (10)
 Otherb 18 (9) 1 (3) 17 (12)
 Unknown 29 (14) 6 (15) 23 (14)
HIV infectionc 25 (12) 7 (17) 18 (11) 0.35
Drug resistanced 0.68
 INH only 49 (24) 12 (29) 37 (23)
 INH, SM only 28 (14) 6 (15) 22 (14)
 RIF only 23 (11) 6 (15) 17 (11)
 INH, RIF 82 (41) 15 (37) 67 (42)
 Other patterns 19 (10) 2 (5) 17 (11)
County 0.001
 Dallas or Tarrant 39 (19) 12 (29) 27 (17)
 Harris 33 (16) 8 (20) 25 (16)
 U.S.-Mexican bordere 76 (38) 14 (34) 62 (39)
 Northeastf 9 (4) 5 (12) 4 (3)
 Other 44 (22) 2 (5) 42 (26)
a

Two-sided Fisher’s exact test comparing clustered and non clustered patients. 

b

Other, Asian countries not including Vietnam, Central and South America, and Africa. 

c

This represents a minimum estimate, as not all patients were tested for HIV. 

d

INH, isoniazid; SM, streptomycin; RIF, rifampin. 

e

Cameron, El Paso, Hidalgo, Maverick, Starr, and Webb counties. 

f

Anderson, Rusk, Shelby, Smith, and Upshur counties.