Aesthetic outcome BCCT.core
Study	Intervention type	BCCT.core‐ Intervention	BCCT.core‐ Control	P value	Conclusion
Hilli‐Betz 2014	VD	Excellent: 4.3%, good: 75.4%, moderate: 18.8%	BCCT.core Excellent: 10.6%, good: 77.0%, moderate in 5.6%, poor in 0.6%	< 0.001	OPS significantly worse in expert panel cosmetic than standard segnentectomy
Lansu 2014	VD	Mean (SD) 2.45 (0.52)	Mean (SD) 2.11 (0.6)	0.02	OPS significantly better than control
Santos 2015	VD	BCCT.core: Excellent: 22.8%, good: 54.4%, moderate: 21.1%, bad:1.8%, poor in 1.8%	BCCT.core Excellent: 6.2%, good: 73.8%, moderate: 15.4%, poor: 4.6%	0.004	OPS significantly better than control