Table 2.
Primary a | Sensitivity 1 b | Sensitivity 2 c | Sensitivity 3 d | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | RR | 95% CI | n | RR | 95% CI | n | RR | 95% CI | n | RR | 95% CI | |
White | 26 | 1 | reference | 38 | 1 | reference | 38 | 1 | reference | 90 | 1 | reference |
Black | 29 | 15 | (7.1 to 32) | 51 | 22 | (13 to 38) | 51 | 6.8 | (4.2 to 11) | 106 | 6.9 | (5.1 to 9.3) |
Asian | 12 | 11 | (2.2 to 57) | 30 | 15 | (7.7 to 30) | 30 | 9.1 | (4.7 to 18) | 16 | 1.3 | (0.64 to 2.7) |
Other | 6 | 1.6 | (0.58 to 4.2) | 12 | 3.2 | (1.6 to 6.1) | 12 | 2.0 | (1.0 to 4.0) | 86 | 13 | (9.9 to 17) |
Total | 73 | 131 | 131 | 298 |
The primary analyses, including only data from the participating centers.
Sensitivity analyses 1, including data from Whittaker et al. (27) taking the whole of England as the reference value (resulting in overestimation of the relative risk).
Sensitivity analyses 2, including data from Whittaker et al. (27) taking the borough of Lewisham (London) as the reference value (resulting in underestimation of the relative risk).