Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 29;10(2):445–464. doi: 10.1007/s40119-021-00240-8

Table 1.

Studies reporting data on adherence, persistence or compliance in patients taking branded or generic atorvastatin

First author of study (year) [refererence], study type Sample size, N Treatment regimen (generic or brand), n Dose (mg)/prevention type Measure of adherence/ persistence/compliance Adherent/persistent/compliant p value Follow-up period
Adherence
 Tsioufis (2017) [58], observational 190 ATO (continued brand), 95 NA Adherence: PDC (%) 79.1  < 0.001 18 months
ATO (switched to generic), 95 73.0
ATO (continued brand), 95 Compliance: high adherence (%; rate, MMAS-4) 73.7  < 0.001
ATO (switched to generic), 95 26.3
 Mano (2015) [59], observational 282 ATO (continued brand), 147 5–30 Adherence: median % PDC (% change pre- to post-index)

89.4 (− 10.3)

92.2 (− 8.6)

0.058 (0.443d) 180 days
ATO (switched to generic), 135 2.5–10
ATO (continued brand), 147 Patients achieving ‘adherence’: PDC ≥ 80%), n (%) 93 (63.3) 0.162
ATO (switched to generic), 135 96 (71.1)
 Jackevicius (2016) [60]a, observational 15,726 ATO (prescribed brand), 7863 Mean dose: 47.7/secondary Adherence: MPR (%) 88.4 1 year
ATO (prescribed generic), 7863 Mean dose: 47.2/secondary 88.4
 Romanelli (2014) [57]b, observational 3417

ATO (switched to generic): 1786

Other statins (switched to generic): 1631

‘Adherent’ patients: MPR ≥ 80%, n (%) 2575 (75.4) 6 months
 Kwon (2016) [61], observational 747 ATO (prescribed brand), NA NA Coverage ratio (< 1 indicates missed ≥ 1 dose) 0.9 ± 2.1  < 0.0001 24 months
ATO (prescribed generic), NA 0.6 ± 0.9
Persistence
 Tsioufis (2017) [58], observational 190 ATO (continued brand), 95 NA Persistence rate (%) 90.1 0.1627 18 months
ATO (switched to generic), 95 76.4
 Mano (2015) [59], observational 282 ATO (continued brand), 147 5–30 Persistence rate (%) 67.3 0.097 180 days
ATO (switched to generic), 135 2.5–10 75.6c

ATO Atorvastatin, MMAS-4 4-Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, MPR medication possession ratio, NA not available, PDC proportion of days covered

aPatients who switched from branded to generic formulations, or vice versa, were censored

bIncludes other statins in addition to atorvastatin. Of those receiving branded atorvastatin, 57% were switched to generic atorvastatin

cNo significant difference after Cox proportional-hazards regression model analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.61–1.55)

dParentheses indicate comparison of % change pre- to post-index