Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 15;9:705791. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.705791

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the included studies.

Subgroup analyses No. Case/control Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PLR (95% CI) NLR (95% CI) DOR (95% CI)
Ethnicity America 4 203/94 0.79 (0.72–0.84) 0.74 (0.64–0.83) 2.92 (2.11–4.20) 0.29 (0.21–0.38) 10.32 (5.92–18.01)
Asia 41 3685/1493 0.55 (0.53–0.56) 0.77 (0.74–0.79) 2.70 (2.09–3.50) 0.40 (0.30–0.52) 7.64 (4.70–12.41)
Europe 30 2295/850 0.70 (0.68–0.72) 0.76 (0.73–0.79) 3.92 (2.72–5.66) 0.28 (0.21–0.39) 20.24 (10.10–40.57)
Cancer type DSC 44 3366/1252 0.65 (0.64–0.67) 0.79 (0.77–0.81) 3.62 (2.68–4.90) 0.27 (0.19–0.38) 15.69 (8.99–27.41)
ESC 10 994/299 0.55 (0.52–0.58) 0.70 (0.64–0.76) 2.66 (1.24–5.73) 0.54 (0.39–0.74) 5.57 (1.70–18.25)
NSC 3 84/107 0.85 (0.76–0.92) 0.80 (0.71–0.87) 4.40 (1.67–11.63) 0.17 (0.01–0.28) 26.31 (6.92–99.99)
RSC 10 1258/372 0.49 (0.46–0.51) 0.69 (0.64–0.74) 1.79 (1.26–2.54) 0.52 (0.36–0.75) 4.04 (1.88–8.70)
USC 8 483/407 0.76 (0.72–0.80) 0.76 (0.71–0.80) 3.40 (2.22–5.20) 0.32 (0.25–0.39) 12.36 (6.49–23.57)
Specimen Urine 9 345/289 0.79 (0.74–0.83) 0.82 (0.77–0.86) 5.50 (2.78–10.90) 0.29 (0.20–0.42) 26.19 (9.26–74.10)
Serum 47 3804/1617 0.66 (0.64–0.67) 0.77 (0.74–0.79) 3.43 (2.60–4.54) 0.29 (0.22–0.38) 14.22 (8.30–24.37)
Plasma 16 1991/456 0.50 (0.47–0.52) 0.72 (0.67–0.76) 1.87 (1.42–2.45) 0.58 (0.47–0.72) 3.64 (2.21–5.93)
Other 3 43/75 0.67 (0.52–0.81) 0.73 (0.62–0.83) 2.83 (1.09–7.35) 0.44 (0.28–0.68) 7.24 (1.84–28.49)
Age < = 60 20 2216/772 0.58 (0.56–0.6) 0.73 (0.7–0.76) 2.52 (1.91–3.32) 0.42 (0.32–0.53) 7.05 (4.15–11.97)
>60 33 2013/934 0.65 (0.63–0.68) 0.77 (0.74–0.8) 3.16 (2.32–4.31) 0.3 (0.21–0.42) 13.48 (7.27–25)
Therapy SURG 18 1560/386 0.68 (0.66–0.71) 0.79 (0.75–0.83) 3.42 (2.39–4.91) 0.26 (0.17–0.41) 15.52 (7.43–32.42)
SURG + CT* 16 1248/461 0.71 (0.68–0.73) 0.77 (0.73–0.8) 3.49 (2.29–5.3) 0.33 (0.24–0.44) 14.39 (6.86–30.17)
SURG + CT + RT 9 862/227 0.44 (0.41–0.47) 0.81 (0.75–0.86) 2.77 (1.68–4.58) 0.48 (0.34–0.69) 6.3 (2.62–15.13)
Type of EVs** lEVs 41 5064/1681 0.57(0.56–0.59) 0.76(0.73–0.78) 2.67(2.10–3.34) 0.39(0.31–0.51) 8.42(5.34–13.28)
sEVs 34 1119/756 0.67(0.65–0.69) 0.81(0.75–0.85) 3.71(2.62–5.25) 0.29(0.22–0.40) 14.61(7.71–27.68)
EVs purification Isolation kit*** 26 2074/875 0.56(0.53–0.58) 0.73(0.7–0.76) 2.52(1.9–3.34) 0.4(0.31–0.53) 7.41(4.31–12.74)
UC# 49 4109/1562 0.65 (0.63–0.66) 0.78(0.76–0.8) 3.51(2.66–4.64) 0.31(0.24–0.41) 13.92(8.3–23.34)
EVs identification NA 11 703/312 0.56 (0.52–0.6) 0.78(0.73–0.83) 2.59(1.44–4.68) 0.36(0.14–0.89) 8.13(2.64–25.06)
Microscopic## 31 2579/1075 0.54 (0.52–0.56) 0.72(0.69–0.75) 2.61(1.98–3.43) 0.41(0.32–0.53) 8.2(4.61–14.6)
Exosomal surface biomarkers### 20 1817/378 0.68(0.66–0.7) 0.8(0.77–0.83) 3.6(2.09–6.18) 0.26(0.13–0.51) 14.86(8.36–26.41)
Quantification and size determination& 13 1084/672 0.74 (0.71–0.76) 0.82(0.77–0.85) 4.35(2.85–6.62) 0.31(0.24–0.41) 16.37(5.91–45.3)
EVs secretion level Increase 62 5123/2095 0.63 (0.61–0.64) 0.77(0.76–0.79) 3.22(2.61–3.98) 0.32(0.26–0.4) 12.31(8.19–18.5)
Decrease 11 1032/302 0.56 (0.53–0.59) 0.69(0.63–0.74) 1.99(1.2–3.3) 0.58(0.41–0.81) 4.21(1.73–10.23)

EVs, extracellular vesicles; DSC, digestive system cancer; ESC, endocrine system cancer; NSC, neuron system cancer; RSC, respiratory system cancer; USC, urinary system cancer; SURG, surgery; CT, chemotherapy; RT; Radiotherapy; lEVs, large EVs; sEVs, small EVS; UC, ultracentrifuge.

*

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant therapy are categorized as chemotherapy.

**

EVs sedimenting at 100,000 × g into is categorized as a small EVs (sEVs) and EVs sedimenting at 2,000 × g is categorized as a large EVs (lEVs, large fragments of cells, large apoptotic bodies) (Mateescu et al., 2017; Slomka et al., 2018).

***

Isolation kit refer to the standard total extracellular vesicles isolation kit media and urine for biomarker analysis.

#

Using the differential ultracentrifugation range (>100,000 ×g (100,000–200,000 ×g) for 2 h) for isolation of different exosome isolation methods yield different amount of exosomes (Patel et al., 2019).

##

Microscopic methods for EVS identification is contended the transmission electron microscope, atomic force microscopy and selected reaction monitoring methods.

###

CD81, CD63, CD64, CD65, and CD66 are a cell surface glycoprotein exosomal cell surface markers that is using mostly for isolation isolating exosomes from tissue culture media and urine for biomarker analysis (Konoshenko et al., 2018).

&

Quantificative methods for EVS identification is the quantificative and size determination based on the western blot and ELISA.