Table 3. Results of population- and individual-level hybridization detection analyses using HyDe (Blischak et al. 2018).
For each putative allotetraploid (Hybrid), Parent 1 and Parent2 are Crataegus subg. Sanguineae diploids1,3 and C. subg. Americanae tetraploids2, respectively (Table 1). Outgroups were the apple, C. monogyna (s21), C. germanica (s07), and C. brachyacantha (s10) accessions (Table 1). Results are shown for C. douglasii and C. rivularis at the population level, and then the individual level (Table 1), where is the admixture statistic, tested for H0: γ = 0 versus H1: γ > 0.
| Parent1 | Hybrid | Parent2 | Z-score | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANG1 | C. douglasii | AMER2 | 7.287 | 1.594 × 10-13 | 0.67244 |
| SANG1 | s03dou | AMER2 | 7.815 | 2.776×10-15 | 0.60647 |
| SANG1 | s16dou | AMER2 | 6.017 | 8.938 ×10-10 | 0.75688 |
| SANG1 | s19dou | AMER2 | 7.676 | 8.216 ×10-15 | 0.64428 |
| SANG3 | C. rivularis | AMER2 | 10.001 | 0.0 | 0.73466 |
| SANG3 | s20riv | AMER2 | 10.011 | 0.0 | 0.69301 |
| SANG3 | s04riv | AMER2 | 9.751 | 0.0 | 0.77420 |
| SANG3 | s12riv | AMER2 | 10.178 | 0.0 | 0.72819 |
Notes.
C. suksdorfii s15, s24.
C. chrysocarpa s06, s17, C. macracantha s11, s18.
C. saligna s13, s14.