Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;45(2):1195–1204. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01683-2

Table 2.

Patient outcome and complications compared in ten studies

Author Year Treatment EVD in CM group Outcome assessment Good outcome P value Mortality rate P value Follow-up (months)
Surgery Control Surgery Control
ZHANG SW 2019 Stereotactic aspiration Yes mRS < 3

7/19

36.8%

6/36

16.7%

0.094

4/19

21.1%

16/36

44.4%

0.086 3
LAN ZG 2019 Microscope No mRS < 3

11/46

23.9%

45/240

18.8%

0.419

14/46

30.4%

169/240

70.4%

 < 0.001 6
LV CL 2019 Stereotactic aspiration No NIHSS ↓45%

25/43

58.1%

20/65

30.8%

0.005

4/43

9.3%

12/65

18.5%

0.190 3
ZHANG YQ 2017 Aspiration No Barthel index > 40

8/32

25.0%

1/33

3.0%

0.010

18/32

56.3%

27/33

81.8%

0.026 3
HUANG KY 2016 Microscope YES NIHSS ↓45%

17/30

56.7%

12/30

40.0%

0.196

4/30

13.3%

11/30

36.7%

0.037 12
ZONG L 2016 Microscope No Barthel index > 60

4/8

50.0%

11/32

34.4%

0.414

2/8

25.0%

13/32

40.6%

0.414 3
CHEN QM 2015 Microscope No GOS > 3

1/15

6.7%

0/30

0%

0.333*

9/15

60.0%

29/30

96.7%

0.001 3
KU HB 2014 Stereotactic aspiration Yes NIHSS ↓45%

25/64

39.0%

9/72

12.5%

 < 0.001

13/64

30.3%

42/72

58.3%

 < 0.001 1
WANG J 2014 Microscope No GOS > 3

10/37

27.2%

4/91

4.4%

 < 0.001

14/37

37.8%

58/91

63.7%

0.007 3
HUANG JL 2010 Stereotactic aspiration No GOS > 3

5/10

50.0%

0/11

0%

0.012*

2/10

20.0%

11/11

100.0%

 < 0.001* 6

CM conservative treatment, EVD external ventricular drainage, GOS Glasgow Outcome Scale, mRS modified Rankin scale, NIHSS National Institute of Health stroke scale, *Fisher’s exact test, bold type indicates significant difference (P < 0.05)