Author(s) (NCI trial No.) |
Study design |
Ph |
Status |
Drug(s) used |
Primary outcome |
Secondary outcome |
No. of OS pts <18 years |
Outcome(s) |
Lussier et al. [30] and Merchant et al. [31] (NCT02500797) |
Randomized, crossover |
II |
Active, NR |
Nivolumab +/- ipilimumab |
Pts w/ CR (UTAI 44 mo) |
DoR, CBR, PFS and OS (6 mo) |
N/A |
CR: initial single therapy (IST) = 2/42 (4.8%) vs. initial dual therapy (IDT) = 6/42 (14.3%) DoR: IST: 7.4 mo (3.2 to 11.6), IDT: 6.2 mo (1.4 to 14.1) 6 mo CBR in IST: 10 pt (3 to 22), IDT: 12 pt (6 to 28) PFS: IST = 1.7 mo (1.4 to 4.3), IDT = 4.1 mo (2.6 to 4.7); OMS: IST = 10.7 mo, IDT = 14.3 mo |
Tawbi et al. [32] and Keung et al. [33] (NCT02301039) |
Non-randomized cohort |
II |
Active, NR |
Pembrolizumab |
ORR (8 wks UTAI 5 yrs) |
AE, PFS, ir-RC, OS (UTAI 5 yrs) |
6 |
Bone sarcoma arm: ORR: 5% (5.5-25.3) 9/42 with AE; PFS in 8 (7 to 9); ir-RC: PR = 2 and CR = 0; OS: 52 (40 to 72) |
Juergens et al. [37] (NCT00560235) |
Non-randomized cohort |
I/II |
Complete |
Figitumumab |
ORR |
PFS, OS, ADA titer |
107 |
ORR = 14.2% (8.1 to 22.3), 25 = SD PFS = 1.9 mo (1.8 to 2.1); OS = 8.9 mo (7.2 to 10.8) = modest activity as monotherapy. Strong association b/w pretreatment serum IGF-1 and survival benefit identified (median 10.4 mo = p <0.001) |
Schwartz et al. [38] (NCT01016015) |
Non-randomized cohort |
II |
Complete |
Cixutumumab + temsirolimus |
RECIST 1.1 PFS (12 wks) |
— |
4 |
PFS = PR = 4, SD = 98, PD = 56 |
Asmane et al. [39] (NCT00668148) |
Non-randomized cohort |
II |
Complete |
Cixutumumab |
RECIST 1.1 PFS (12 wks) |
PFS (UTAI 105.4 wks), ORR, OS, CBR |
N/A youngest pt: 17 y/o |
PFS = 27.3% (8.5 to 50.4), total = 31.9% (23.0 to 41.0); PFS (105.4 wk) = 6.4% (5.1 to 12.1), total = 6.7% (6.0 to 11.0); ORR: 5.6% (0.1 to 27.3), total = 1.8% (0.2 to 6.4); OS: 24.1 wks (12.6 to 37.6), total = 38.4 wks (31.1 to 52.0); CBR: 33.3% (13.3 to 59.0), total = 41.4% (32.2 to 51.2) |
Turner et al. [40] (NCT00667342) |
Non-randomized, parallel |
II |
Complete |
Bevacizumab + cis + dox + MAP/bevacizumab + MAP + ifos + etoposide |
Pts w/ DLT 3-yr EFS |
Stratum HR, 2-yr EFS, 2-yr OS |
43 |
Bevacizumab dosage scaling using ideal body weight would provide an improved dosing approach in children by minimizing PK variability and reducing likelihood of major wound healing complications. (p <0.05) 3-year EFS in LR: 0.575 (0.402 to 0.747), HR at wk 10: 24/42 (LRD + MD) w/ 5-50% tumor (grade IIB) seen, 11/42 w/ <5% tumor (grade III) seen, 2-yr EFS = 0.617 (0.470 to 0.764), 2-yr OS = 0.880 (0.782 to 0.978) |
Children’s Oncology Group (NCT02470091) |
Non-randomized cohort |
I/II |
Active, NR |
Denosumab |
DC (4 and 12 mo) |
PK |
42 |
Cohort I: measurable disease (RECIST 1.1) vs. cohort II: complete resection of all sites of MD w/i 30 d before enrolment at 12 mo, outcome in cohort II > cohort I — 6 patients w/ response (0.667 (0.195 to 0.904) |
NCI (NCT02484443) |
Non-randomized cohort |
II |
Active, NR |
Dinutuximab + sargramostim (GM-CSF) |
DC (12 mo) |
t1/2 |
33 |
DC: 11/39 (28.2%) t1/2α = 0.8 (0.566 to 1.89), t1/2β = 7.5 (7.25 to 7.86), Cmax = 18.4 (7.58 to 26.3) |
NCI (NCT00831844) |
Non-randomized cohort |
II |
Complete |
Cixutumumab (anti-IGF-1R) |
DR |
— |
8 |
DR > 24 wks = 0/9 pts |
Kopp et al. [41] (NCT02487979) |
Non-randomized cohort |
I |
Active, NR |
Glembatumumab (CDX-011 against GPNMB) |
Pts w/ DLT, 3-yr EFS |
HR |
Median age: 20.09 |
DC in 3/22 (13.6%), 1/22 = PR, 2/22 = SD (extent of DC was not met for stage II), glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) exp.: 13/19 with 3+ staining (strong) = no relation to Exp./response |
Merchant et al. [42] (NCT00428272) |
Non-randomized, parallel |
I |
Terminated |
Lexatumumab (HGS-ERT2) +/- ifn-γ |
MTD/DLTs (6 mo), PK (2 yr) |
TRR, Exp. of pro-apoptotic proteins, ADA titer |
N/A |
TRR (3-24 cycles): SD = 5, CR/PR = 0, evidence of anti-tumor activity: 1 pt with recurrent progressive OS experienced resolution of clinical symptoms, PET activity and SD > 1 yr |