Table 6.
Postparticipation survey: acceptability domain.
| Subdomains and questions | Total percentage agreementa (N=32)b, % (n/N) | App percentage agreementa (N=20)b, % (n/N) | Tag percentage agreementa (N=12)b, % (n/N) | P valuec | |
| Usefulness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The system would be useful for contact tracing. | 81 (25/31) | 74 (14/19) | 92 (11/12) | .22 |
|
|
The app has all the functions and capabilities I expected it to have. | 58 (18/31) | 42 (8/19) | 83 (10/12) | .02 |
| Coherence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I understand how data collected with this system would be used for contact tracing. | 84 (27/32) | 80 (16/20) | 92 (11/12) | .38 |
|
|
I understand how this system currently protects my privacy. | 69 (22/32) | 65 (13/20) | 75 (9/12) | .56 |
| Social influence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peers whose opinions I value have vocalized their support for this system. | 37 (10/27) | 24 (4/17) | 60 (6/10) | .06 |
|
|
Supervisors in my workplace have vocalized their support for this system. | 81 (21/26) | 83 (15/18) | 75 (6/8) | .62 |
|
|
Peers whose opinions I value have voiced concerns about using this system. | 45 (13/29) | 50 (9/18) | 36 (4/11) | .47 |
|
|
Supervisors in my workplace have voiced concerns about using this system. | 8 (2/25) | 12 (2/17) | 0 (0/8) | .31 |
| Setting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical assistance was available when needed. | 71 (20/28) | 71 (12/17) | 73 (8/11) | .90 |
|
|
The decision to use or not use this system will remain under my control. | 84 (26/31) | 79 (15/19) | 92 (11/12) | .35 |
aPercentage agreement was calculated by dividing the number of Likert responses indicating agreement by the total number of Likert responses for each question.
bSome questions were not answered by all participants; exact counts of agreement and total responses are shown in parentheses for each question.
cP values obtained using tests of proportions to evaluate differences between pilots.