. 2021 Oct 29;69(4):801–814. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01550-2

Table 2.

Analysis of variances (ANOVA) of average importance scores for different sections of ecosystem services within four variables of respondents’ social profiles and preferences

Variables of social profiles*	Sections of ecosystem services
Variables of social profiles*	Provisioning	Regulating and maintenance	Cultural
Groups^a	F = 3.921, p = 0.0501	F = 0.562, p = 0.455	F = 0.017, p = 0.898
Regular job^b	F = 2.407, p = 0.0693	F = 1.906, p = 0.131	F = 0.731, p = 0.535
Gender^c	F = 2.834, p = 0.063	F = 0.463, p = 0.631	F = 1.022, p = 0.363
Age^c	F = 1.211, p = 0.306	F = 2.806, p = 0.014	F = 0.81, p = 0.564

Numbers in bold present significant results

^aGroups of birdwatchers, farmers and scientists were used for the analysis

^bRegular job or fields used for the analysis of the three groups: nature related, technology and others. Farming was assumed as a nature related job

^cGender and age variables were used only from the social profiles of birdwatchers and scientists, while farmers were excluded