Table 3.
ROI | GMV mean (SD) | HC vs. SZ (with TIV as covariate) | HC > SZ | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HC | SZ | F(1) | p | ηp2 |
t (uncorr) (Bonf. corr) |
df | p | p | Hedge’s g | |
MPFC | 0.53 (0.03) | 0.49 (0.05) | 10.86 | 0.002 | 0.17 | 3.15 | 41 | 0.003 | 0.042 | 0.87 |
LIPAR | 0.49 (0.03) | 0.46 (0.05) | 6.61 | 0.013 | 0.11 | 3.15 | 39 | 0.014 | 0.16 | 0.71 |
RIPAR | 0.50 (0.04) | 0.49 (0.05) | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 0.65 | 47 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.18 |
PCC | 0.60 (0.06) | 0.59 (0.06) | 1.1 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.61 | 48 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.17 |
LHC | 0.54 (0.04) | 0.52 (0.04) | 2.92 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 1.79 | 51 | 0.08 | 1.00 | 0.48 |
RHC | 0.54 (0.03) | 0.53 (0.04) | 2.94 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 1.14 | 47 | 0.26 | 1.00 | 0.31 |
DACC | 0.52 (0.04) | 0.48 (0.04) | 18.33 | < 0.001 | 0.26 | 3.57 | 50 | < 0.001 | 0.0014 | 0.95 |
LAI | 0.56 (0.05) | 0.53 (0.05) | 10.16 | 0.002 | 0.16 | 2.23 | 47 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.61 |
RAI | 0.60 (0.05) | 0.56 (0.05) | 12.25 | < 0.001 | 0.19 | 2.80 | 51 | 0.007 | 0.098 | 0.74 |
LFEF | 0.53 (0.07) | 0.50 (0.05) | 5.1 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 1.74 | 53 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.44 |
RFEF | 0.51 (0.06) | 0.47 (0.05) | 14.18 | < 0.001 | 0.21 | 2.95 | 54 | 0.005 | 0.07 | 0.76 |
LIPS | 0.49 (0.07) | 0.45 (0.04) | 6.42 | 0.014 | 0.11 | 2.73 | 50 | 0.009 | 0.13 | 0.69 |
RIPS | 0.49 (0.06) | 0.47 (0.05) | 2.81 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 1.53 | 54 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 0.40 |
TIV | 1.59 (0.11) | 1.54 (0.14) | 1.51 | 44 | 0.14 | 1.00 | 0.41 |
Group differences in GMV were analyzed with ANCOVA using TIV as covariate. The results of post-hoc analyses with Welch two sample t-tests with both uncorrected and Bonferroni corrected p values and Hedge’s g effect sizes are summarized