Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 4;34(6):762–778. doi: 10.1007/s10548-021-00868-8

Table 3.

Mean TIV-adjusted gray matter volume (GMV) of each region of interest (ROI) and mean total intra-cranial volume (TIV) per group

ROI GMV mean (SD) HC vs. SZ (with TIV as covariate) HC > SZ
HC SZ F(1) p ηp2 t
(uncorr) (Bonf. corr)
df p p Hedge’s g
MPFC 0.53 (0.03) 0.49 (0.05) 10.86 0.002 0.17 3.15 41 0.003 0.042 0.87
LIPAR 0.49 (0.03) 0.46 (0.05) 6.61 0.013 0.11 3.15 39 0.014 0.16 0.71
RIPAR 0.50 (0.04) 0.49 (0.05) 0.53 0.47 0.01 0.65 47 0.52 1.00 0.18
PCC 0.60 (0.06) 0.59 (0.06) 1.1 0.30 0.02 0.61 48 0.54 1.00 0.17
LHC 0.54 (0.04) 0.52 (0.04) 2.92 0.09 0.05 1.79 51 0.08 1.00 0.48
RHC 0.54 (0.03) 0.53 (0.04) 2.94 0.09 0.05 1.14 47 0.26 1.00 0.31
DACC 0.52 (0.04) 0.48 (0.04) 18.33  < 0.001 0.26 3.57 50  < 0.001 0.0014 0.95
LAI 0.56 (0.05) 0.53 (0.05) 10.16 0.002 0.16 2.23 47 0.03 0.42 0.61
RAI 0.60 (0.05) 0.56 (0.05) 12.25  < 0.001 0.19 2.80 51 0.007 0.098 0.74
LFEF 0.53 (0.07) 0.50 (0.05) 5.1 0.03 0.10 1.74 53 0.09 1.00 0.44
RFEF 0.51 (0.06) 0.47 (0.05) 14.18  < 0.001 0.21 2.95 54 0.005 0.07 0.76
LIPS 0.49 (0.07) 0.45 (0.04) 6.42 0.014 0.11 2.73 50 0.009 0.13 0.69
RIPS 0.49 (0.06) 0.47 (0.05) 2.81 0.10 0.05 1.53 54 0.13 1.00 0.40
TIV 1.59 (0.11) 1.54 (0.14) 1.51 44 0.14 1.00 0.41

Group differences in GMV were analyzed with ANCOVA using TIV as covariate. The results of post-hoc analyses with Welch two sample t-tests with both uncorrected and Bonferroni corrected p values and Hedge’s g effect sizes are summarized