Table 4.
Group differences in mean directed connectivity strengths for each region of interest (ROI)
| Connection | Connectivity strength Mean (SD) |
HC vs. SZ (adjusted for GMV) |
HC > SZ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | SZ | F (1) | p | ηp2 | t | df | P (uncorr) |
p (Bonf. corr) |
Hedge’s g | |
| MPFC to LHC | 0.05 (0.33) | 0.24 (0.47) | 3.54 | 0.07 | 0.06 | − 1.75 | 41 | 0.08 | 1.0 | − 0.48 |
| PCC to RAI | 0.03 (0.37) | − 0.16 (0.47) | 3.87 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 1.94 | 45 | 0.06 | 1.0 | 0.52 |
| PCC to MPFC | 0.03 (0.43) | − 0.18 (0.34) | 4.24 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 2.08 | 54 | 0.05 | 1.0 | 0.54 |
| PCC to RHC | 0.04 (0.44) | − 0.19 (0.41) | 3.48 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 1.96 | 53 | 0.06 | 1.0 | 0.52 |
| PCC to DACC | 0.14 (0.3) | − 0.11 (0.4) | 7.3 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 2.58 | 43 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.71 |
| LHC to RHC | 0.5 (0.46) | 0.18 (0.51) | 5.01 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 2.11 | 49 | 0.04 | 0.96 | 0.57 |
| LHC to LIPS | - 0.12 (0.78) | 0.09 (0.81) | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.02 | − 0.99 | 51 | 0.33 | 1.0 | − 0.26 |
| LHC to LIPAR | 0.17 (0.6) | − 0.25 (0.8) | 5.29 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 2.16 | 44 | 0.04 | 0.96 | 0.59 |
| LHC to DACC | − 0.27 (0.44) | − 0.06 (0.74) | 1 | 0.32 | 0.02 | − 1.27 | 37 | 0.21 | 1.0 | − 0.36 |
| LHC to RIPS | − 0.001 (0.57) | 0.27 (0.7) | 2.64 | 0.11 | 0.05 | − 1.59 | 46 | 0.12 | 1.0 | − 0.43 |
| LHC to RIPAR | 0.28 (0.79) | − 0.04 (0.05) | 1.9 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 1.59 | 54 | 0.12 | 1.0 | 0.41 |
| LHC to RAI | − 0.44 (0.54) | 0.33 (0.9) | 3.11 | 0.08 | 0.06 | − 1.84 | 38 | 0.08 | 1.0 | − 0.51 |
| LHC to PCC | 0.45 (0.66) | 0.22 (1.03) | 0.88 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 0.95 | 39 | 0.35 | 1.0 | 0.26 |
| LHC to LFEF | − 0.03 (0.56) | 0.2 (0.53) | 2.76 | 0.1 | 0.05 | − 1.6 | 53 | 0.12 | 1.0 | − 0.42 |
| RHC to RAI | − 0.13 (0.85) | 0.08 (0.94) | 1.04 | 0.31 | 0 | − 0.87 | 49 | 0.39 | 1.0 | − 0.23 |
| RHC to RFEF | 0.08 (0.55) | 0.24 (0.44) | 2.64 | 0.11 | 0.01 | − 1.23 | 54 | 0.23 | 1.0 | − 0.32 |
| RFEF to LHC | 0.14 (0.38) | − 0.05 (0.33) | 3.57 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 2.03 | 54 | 0.05 | 1.0 | 0.53 |
| RFEF to RIPS | 0.33 (0.41) | 0.11 (0.47) | 2.68 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 1.91 | 49 | 0.06 | 1.0 | 0.51 |
| RHC to LHC | 0.45 (0.5) | 0.22 (0.55) | 3.55 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 1.61 | 50 | 0.12 | 1.0 | 0.43 |
| RHC to RIPS | − 0.03 (0.93) | 0.3 (0.64) | 2.03 | 0.16 | 0.04 | − 1.53 | 53 | 0.13 | 1.0 | − 0.39 |
| RHC to LAI | − 0.3 (1.21) | 0.08 (0.81) | 2.16 | 0.15 | 0.04 | − 1.41 | 52 | 0.17 | 1.0 | − 0.36 |
| LIPS to RHC | 0.07 (0.38) | − 0.18 (0.37) | 5.57 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 2.44 | 52 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.65 |
| RIPS to DACC | 0.04 (0.33) | − 0.19 (0.41) | 5.2 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 2.23 | 46 | 0.03 | 0.72 | 0.60 |
| RAI to LHC | 0.16 (0.4) | − 0.02 (0.36) | 4.03 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 1.82 | 53 | 0.08 | 1.0 | 0.48 |
Welch two samples t tests with both uncorrected and Bonferroni corrected p values and Hedge’s g effect sizes are summarized. The arrows indicate the connectivity direction between nodes