Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021 Sep 29;178:113992. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113992

Table 5.

Liposomal drug loading.

Loading Method Localization Drug Properties %EE Pros Cons References [91, 97104]
Passive Thin film hydration Aqueous core Hydrophilic small molecules
Proteins
<5% Small batch
Good for lab scale
Low encapsulation
Small internal volume
Not scalable
High drug leak
[67, 105]
Lipid bilayer Lipophilic small molecules <5%
Freeze/thaw-extension of TFH As above As above 5-20% Increased internal volume
Improved PDI
Not scalable
High drug leak
[91, 106108]
Reverse phase evaporation Aqueous core Hydrophilic drugs ≤50% Increased loading
Useful for protein drugs
Solvent contamination [65, 91, 107] [109]
Active pH/salt gradient Aqueous core Weak base small molecules ≤100% Increased loading Limited to weak bases
Potential resistance to drug release at target site
[91, 110, 111]
Ionic gradient Aqueous core Weak acid small molecules ≤100% Increased loading and retention Limited to weak acids [100, 112, 113]
Cyclodextrin pre-encapsulation Aqueous core Hydrophobic or poorly soluble/non-ionizable drugs ≤95% Enables active loading of non-ionizable drugs Limited utility [114116]
Dehydration-rehydration Aqueous core Proteins, other large molecules 20-52% Increased loading of large molecules Potential protein denaturation [91, 108, 117, 118]

Abbreviations: EE-encapsulation efficiency; TFH- thin film hydration, PDI-polydispersity index