Table 5.
Liposomal drug loading.
| Loading Method | Localization | Drug Properties | %EE | Pros | Cons | References [91, 97–104] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passive | Thin film hydration | Aqueous core | Hydrophilic small molecules Proteins |
<5% | Small batch Good for lab scale |
Low encapsulation Small internal volume Not scalable High drug leak |
[67, 105] |
| Lipid bilayer | Lipophilic small molecules | <5% | |||||
| Freeze/thaw-extension of TFH | As above | As above | 5-20% | Increased internal volume Improved PDI |
Not scalable High drug leak |
[91, 106–108] | |
| Reverse phase evaporation | Aqueous core | Hydrophilic drugs | ≤50% | Increased loading Useful for protein drugs |
Solvent contamination | [65, 91, 107] [109] | |
| Active | pH/salt gradient | Aqueous core | Weak base small molecules | ≤100% | Increased loading | Limited to weak bases Potential resistance to drug release at target site |
[91, 110, 111] |
| Ionic gradient | Aqueous core | Weak acid small molecules | ≤100% | Increased loading and retention | Limited to weak acids | [100, 112, 113] | |
| Cyclodextrin pre-encapsulation | Aqueous core | Hydrophobic or poorly soluble/non-ionizable drugs | ≤95% | Enables active loading of non-ionizable drugs | Limited utility | [114–116] | |
| Dehydration-rehydration | Aqueous core | Proteins, other large molecules | 20-52% | Increased loading of large molecules | Potential protein denaturation | [91, 108, 117, 118] | |
Abbreviations: EE-encapsulation efficiency; TFH- thin film hydration, PDI-polydispersity index