Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 19;7(4):1152–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.10.001

Table 6.

Summary of the metabolites that changed significantly in the livers of growing heifers fed a Lys-adequate diet through RPLC-MS analysis.

Metabolites1 ID2 Formula Mode3 VIP P-value FC4 Direction5
Arachidic acid HMDB02212 C20H40O2 1.47 0.027 0.63
11Z-Eicosenoic acid HMDB02231 C20H38O2 1.44 0.043 0.74
PC (16:0/20:4(8Z, 11Z, 14Z, 17Z)) HMDB08462 C44H80NO8P + 1.39 0.048 1.54
PC (16:0/18:2(9Z, 12Z)) HMDB08133 C42H80NO8P + 1.17 0.049 1.28
PC (16:0/20:3(8Z, 11Z, 14Z)) HMDB07981 C44H82NO8P + 1.16 0.015 1.41
PC (18:0/20:4(8Z, 11Z, 14Z, 17Z)) HMDB08049 C46H84NO8P + 1.23 0.049 1.47
PC (18:0/20:3(5Z, 8Z, 11Z)) HMDB08046 C46H86NO8P + 1.39 0.012 1.59
Cer (d18:1/24:1(15Z)) HMDB04953 C42H81NO3 + 1.11 0.025 1.61
Cer (d18:1/22:0) HMDB04952 C40H79NO3 + 1.10 0.021 1.59
Cer (d18:1/23:0) HMDB00950 C41H81NO3 + 1.02 0.047 1.47

RPLC-MS = reversed-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; VIP = variable important in projection; FC = fold change; PC = phosphatidylcholine; Cer = ceramide.

1

The different metabolites were filtered using significance estimate of P < 0.05 and VIP > 1.0 (n = 5). LD group: growing heifers fed a Lys-deficient diet; LA group: growing heifers fed a Lys-adequate diet.

2

Compound ID of metabolites in human metabolome database.

3

‘-’ indicates negative mode and ‘+’ indicates the positive mode.

4

Fold change indicates the relative amounts of LA group compared with LD group.

5

‘↑’ indicates the metabolite in LA group was increased when compared with LD group; ‘↓’ indicates the metabolite in LA group was decreased when compared with LD group.