Table 2.
JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses* | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Studies/Total Score | Is the Review Question Clearly and Explicitly Stated? | Were the Inclusion Criteria Appropriate for the Review Question? | Was the Search Strategy Appropriate? | Were the Sources and Resources Used to Search For Studies Adequate? | Were the Criteria for Appraising Studies Appropriate? | Was Critical Appraisal Conducted by Two or More Reviewers Independently? | Were There Methods to Minimize Errors in Data Extraction? | Were the Methods Used to Combine Studies Appropriate? | Was the Likelihood of Publication Bias Assessed? | Were Recommendations For Policy and/or Practice Supported by the Reported Data? | Were the Specific Directives for New Research Appropriate? |
Corcoran & Woodward. (2013)/(7/11)26 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | U | U | N | Y | Y |
Notes: *Checklist reproduced from: Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, Holly C, Kahlil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct and reporting of an Umbrella review approach. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare. 2015;13(3):132–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.19 Copyright © 2015, International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2015 The Joanna Briggs Institute.
Abbreviations: Y, yes; N, no; U, unclear.