Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 30;21:1120. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06800-6

Table 2.

Sub-group analysis of the pooled prevalence of hepatitis B infection in Nigeria

Sub-group variables Variable category Included studies Prevalence % (95% CI) I2% p-heterogeneity p-difference
Study group Blood donor 4 13.2 (9.7–17.8) 72.5 0.012 0.129
Pregnant women 17 7.7 (5.8–10.2) 90.1 p < 0.001
HIV positive 7 9.9 (6.7–14.4) 88.6 p < 0.001
HIV positive pregnant women 2 7.0 (2.4–18.7) 93.3 p < 0.001
Others 17 10.8 (8.6–13.5) 91.1 p < 0.001
Mean methodological quality JBI ≤ 6 9 9.1 (6.0–13.4) 92.7 p < 0.001 0.795
JBI > 6 38 9.6 (8.1–11.3) 91.0 p < 0.001
Region/ zone North West 7 12.1 (7.2–19.6) 93.3 p < 0.001 0.005
North East 1 7.1 (5.0–10.0) NA 1.0
South West 15 9.7 (7.1–13.1) 94.3 p < 0.001
South East 6 5.9 (3.8–9.2) 76.7 p < 0.001
South South 6 7.1 (4.9–10.0) 73.6 0.002
North Central 10 11.2 (8.5–14.7) 89.6 p < 0.001
Mixed 2 11.6 (10.0–13.5) 5.0 0.305
Year of publication 2010–2014 18 10.1 (7.9–13.0) 92.6 p < 0.001 0.467
2015–2019 29 9.0 (7.4–11.0) 90.4 p < 0.001
Method of diagnosis ELISA 21 10.0 (7.8–12.6) 93.2 p < 0.001 0.066
RDT 20 8.4 (6.5–10.6) 90.7 p < 0.001
PCR 1 8.3 (5.1–13.4) NA NA
EIA 4 11.9 (8.4–16.7) 75.6 0.006
ICT 1 17.2 (10.81–26.3) NA NA
Setting Rural 4 10.7 (5.01–21.4) 94.3 p < 0.001 0.008
Urban 31 8.2 (6.9– 9.9) 88.0 p < 0.001
Mixed 12 12.6 (10.3–15.3) 86.9 p < 0.001
Age ≤ 17 6 11.4 (7.5–17.1) 87.2 p < 0.001 0.140
> 17 12 12.7 (8.4–18.8) 94.2 p < 0.001
Mixed 23 8.2 (6.8–10.0) 90.8 p < 0.001
Not stated 6 7.8 (5.5–10.9) 73.2 0.002

ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, PCR polymerase chain reaction, ICT immunochromatography, EIA enzyme immunoassay, RDT rapid diagnostic test