Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 29;21:378. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01519-7

Table 2.

Multivariable hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of incident T2DM by number of parity until phase VI (2015–2018): Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

E/N Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Parity (continuous variable)
Per each additional 557/2552 1.10 (1.05–1.16) < 0.001 1.10 (1.04–1.15) < 0.001 1.09 (1.04–1.15) 0.001 1.05 (1.00–1.11) 0.075 1.04 (0.99–1.10) 0.108
Number of parity
1 19/180 1 1 1 1 1
2 99/614 1.48 (0.90–2.41) 0.121 1.48 (0.91–2.43) 0.116 1.48 (0.90–2.42) 0.119 1.41 (0.86–2.31) 0.172 1.39 (0.85–2.27) 0.193
3 128/640 1.74 (1.07–2.83) 0.025 1.75 (1.07–2.86) 0.025 1.73 (1.06–2.83) 0.028 1.54 (0.94–2.52) 0.084 1.50 (0.92–2.45) 0.107
≥ 4 311/1118 2.28 (1.40–3.70) 0.001 2.27 (1.39–3.72) 0.001 2.23 (1.36–3.65) 0.001 1.72 (1.05–2.83) 0.031 1.64 (1.00–2.70) 0.051
P value for trend < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.027 0.055

Model 1: Adjusted for age. Model 2: Adjusted for age, education level, low physical activity, family history of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and anti-hypertensive medications usage. Model 3: Model 2 + further adjusted for history of macrosomia, preeclampsia, and oral contraceptive pill (OCP) usage. Model 4: Model 3 + further adjusted for body mass index and waist circumference. Model 5: Model 4 + further adjusted for triglyceride/ high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus; E: event; N: number