Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 23;2021:9970859. doi: 10.1155/2021/9970859

Table 1.

Factors related to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Items of the questionnaire Total number Number of responses (%)
Disagree (moderately disagree/strongly disagree) (Likert 1-2) Neither agree nor disagree (Likert 3) Agree (moderately agree/strongly agree) (Likert 4-5)
(i) The evolution of the research, given that sometimes there are subsequent findings that are proven uncertain or irreproducible, may reduce the credibility of the CPG recommendations 96 20 (20.8) 5 (5.2) 71 (74.0)
(ii) The complexity of the process recommended in the CPG difficults adherence 96 48 (50.0) 6 (6.3) 42 (43.8)
(iii) Scientific advances organized in the form of guidelines and recommendations are an invaluable help for clinicians 98 2 (2.0) 2 (2.0) 94 (95.9)
(iv) The objective of the guidelines is to provide an up-to-date informative framework that helps the clinician to make the most appropriate decisions individually for each patient 98 3 (3.0) 1 (1.0) 94 (95.9)
(v) The dynamic nature of scientific knowledge implies the periodic reassessment of the CPGs 98 2 (2.0) 0 96 (97.9)
(vi) An effective dissemination of the CPGs and their updates is necessary 98 2 (2.0) 0 96 (97.9)
(vii) There are different CPGs whose recommendations do not coincide 96 13 (13.6) 6 (6.3) 77 (80.2)
(viii) Although a guide is well implemented it is difficult to maintain it, since after a certain time professionals tend to return to their previous routines 96 66 (68.8) 6 (6.3) 24 (25.0)
(ix) It is crucial to incorporate adherence indicators to the CPGs 96 4 (4.2) 6 (6.3) 86 (89.6)
(x) The large number of CPGs on diabetes may prevent effective dissemination 96 6 (6.3) 4 (4.2) 86 (89.6)

Consensus achieved in the first Delphi round; consensus achieved in the second Delphi round.